J W Bangham

959 citations
10 papers · 758 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

J W Bangham

10 papers receiving 719 citations

Hit Papers

Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most...4011979202619942010100200300400

Peers

J W Bangham
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Genetics 350
  • Cancer Research 138
  • Molecular Biology 551
  • Aging 13
  • Reproductive Medicine 60
Replace P.R. Hunsicker with:
P.R. Hunsicker United States
Raffaella Catena France
Yao-Fu Chang United States
Marja Ooms Netherlands
Claude‐Lise Richer Canada
Jacqueline Bernardino-Sgherri France
Michael P. Greenbaum United States
Katarina Gell Sweden
Maxine J. Sutcliffe United States
Y Kim United States
J W Bangham relative to P.R. Hunsicker United States P.R. Hunsicker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P.R. Hunsicker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J W Bangham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J W Bangham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J W Bangham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J W Bangham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J W Bangham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J W Bangham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J W Bangham. The network helps show where J W Bangham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside J W Bangham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J W Bangham Line = papers co-authored together J W Bangham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 199849
2 199114
3 199119
4 199058
5 198987
6 198844
7
Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse.breakdown →
1979401
8
Delimitation of chromosomal regions involved in v-type position effects from x autosome translocations in the mouse. Abstr.
19627
9 196171
10
Further analysis of variegated-type position effects from x-autosome translocations in the mouse. Abstr.
19608

About J W Bangham

J W Bangham is a scholar working on Genetics, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Genetics and Reproduction (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (2 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (1 paper), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper) and Sperm and Testicular Function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (350 citations), Cancer Research (138 citations) and Molecular Biology (551 citations). J W Bangham has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include P.R. Hunsicker, W. L. Russell, Liane B. Russell, E. M. Kelly, N.L.A. Cacheiro, Michael D. Shelby, L. RUSSELL, Ian J. Jackson, Eugene M. Rinchik and Byoung S. Kwon. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Genetics and Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026