J. W. Armstrong

8.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
160 papers, 5.8k citations indexed

About

J. W. Armstrong is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Insect Science and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, J. W. Armstrong has authored 160 papers receiving a total of 5.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 94 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 44 papers in Insect Science and 34 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in J. W. Armstrong's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (36 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (35 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (33 papers). J. W. Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (36 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (35 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (33 papers). J. W. Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. J. W. Armstrong's co-authors include Massimo Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, B. J. Rickett, Richard Woo, S. R. Spangler, L. Iess, Paolo Tortora, S. W. Asmar, W. A. Coles and Robert G. Hollingsworth and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

J. W. Armstrong

153 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Hit Papers

Electron density power spectrum in the local interstellar... 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. W. Armstrong United States 39 4.0k 991 852 690 680 160 5.8k
T. P. O’Brien United States 34 4.5k 1.1× 86 0.1× 78 0.1× 1.6k 2.3× 100 0.1× 129 7.3k
Prasenjit Saha Switzerland 36 2.2k 0.5× 104 0.1× 386 0.5× 768 1.1× 55 0.1× 173 3.7k
Richard Wilson United States 26 654 0.2× 127 0.1× 130 0.2× 179 0.3× 174 0.3× 90 1.9k
I. Bartos United States 31 2.5k 0.6× 104 0.1× 73 0.1× 140 0.2× 106 0.2× 114 3.8k
J. M. Forbes United States 72 15.8k 4.0× 80 0.1× 103 0.1× 380 0.6× 3.2k 4.7× 519 20.2k
G. Pérès Italy 33 3.0k 0.7× 48 0.0× 115 0.1× 79 0.1× 41 0.1× 192 3.5k
M. Rother Germany 33 2.1k 0.5× 29 0.0× 235 0.3× 81 0.1× 702 1.0× 74 3.3k
Ryosuke Nakamura Japan 27 1.2k 0.3× 45 0.0× 181 0.2× 65 0.1× 26 0.0× 215 2.9k
Neal J. Evans United States 62 13.1k 3.3× 25 0.0× 1.2k 1.4× 320 0.5× 26 0.0× 319 13.9k
Takao Fujita Japan 44 1.7k 0.4× 169 0.2× 243 0.3× 67 0.1× 9 0.0× 324 7.1k

Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Armstrong. The network helps show where J. W. Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. W. Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. W. Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. W. Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. W. Armstrong. J. W. Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Iess, L., P. Racioppa, Daniele Durante, et al.. (2017). The Dark Side of Saturn's Gravity. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017. 1 indexed citations
2.
Marouf, E. A., A. J. Kliore, N. J. Rappaport, et al.. (2014). First Cassini Radio Science Bistatic Scattering Observation of Titan's Northern Seas. 2014 AGU Fall Meeting. 2014. 1 indexed citations
3.
Iess, L., Marzia Parisi, M. Ducci, et al.. (2013). The Gravity Field of Enceladus from the three Cassini Flybys. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2013. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ducci, M., L. Iess, J. W. Armstrong, et al.. (2012). The Geodesy of the Main Saturnian Satellites from Range Rate Measurements of the Cassini Spacecraft. IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome). 2200. 3 indexed citations
5.
Iess, L., R. A. Jacobson, M. Ducci, et al.. (2012). The gravity field of the Saturnian satellites Enceladus and Dione. AGUFM. 2012. 1 indexed citations
6.
Follett, Peter A., Thomas W. Phillips, J. W. Armstrong, & J. H. MOY. (2011). Generic Phytosanitary Radiation Treatment for Tephritid Fruit Flies Provides Quarantine Security for Bactrocera latifrons (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 104(5). 1509–1513. 9 indexed citations
7.
Iess, L., J. W. Armstrong, S. W. Asmar, et al.. (2010). The Gravity Field of Enceladus. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2010. 4 indexed citations
8.
Armstrong, J. W., Juming Tang, & Shaojin Wang. (2009). Thermal Death Kinetics of Mediterranean, Malaysian, Melon, and Oriental Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Eggs and Third Instars. Journal of Economic Entomology. 102(2). 522–532. 30 indexed citations
9.
Rappaport, N. J., R. A. Jacobson, L. Iess, et al.. (2008). The gravity field of Titan from Four Cassini Flybys. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008(6). 136–7. 2 indexed citations
10.
Rappaport, N. J., L. Iess, Paolo Tortora, et al.. (2007). The Gravity Science Analysis of Cassini Flybys T11 and T22 and Future Work. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007.
11.
12.
Armstrong, J. W., F. B. Estabrook, S. W. Asmar, L. Iess, & Paolo Tortora. (2006). Reducing Antenna Mechanical Noise in Precision Doppler Tracking. 1–6. 3 indexed citations
13.
Armstrong, J. W.. (2006). Low-Frequency Gravitational Wave Searches Using Spacecraft Doppler Tracking. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 1–1. 69 indexed citations
14.
Hollingsworth, Robert G. & J. W. Armstrong. (2005). Potential of Temperature, Controlled Atmospheres, and Ozone Fumigation to Control Thrips and Mealybugs on Ornamental Plants for Export. Journal of Economic Entomology. 98(2). 289–298. 11 indexed citations
15.
Follett, Peter A. & J. W. Armstrong. (2004). Revised Irradiation Doses to Control Melon Fly, Mediterranean Fruit Fly, and Oriental Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) and a Generic Dose for Tephritid Fruit Flies. Journal of Economic Entomology. 97(4). 1254–1262. 76 indexed citations
16.
Hollingsworth, Robert G., et al.. (2002). Scouting Methods for Detection of Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on Dendrobium Orchids in Hawaii. Environmental Entomology. 31(3). 523–532. 11 indexed citations
17.
Hollingsworth, Robert G., J. W. Armstrong, & Earl W. Campbell. (2002). Caffeine as a repellent for slugs and snails. Nature. 417(6892). 915–916. 125 indexed citations
18.
Vargas, Roger I., et al.. (2001). Potential for Areawide Integrated Management of Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) with a Braconid Parasitoid and a Novel Bait Spray. Journal of Economic Entomology. 94(4). 817–825. 166 indexed citations
19.
Armstrong, J. W.. (1992). Fruit fly disinfestation strategies beyond methyl bromide. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 20(2). 181–193. 18 indexed citations
20.
Brown, David W., et al.. (1986). Parkes-CDSCC telemetry array: Equipment design. 85. 85–110. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026