J. Van Dam

2.0k total citations
38 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

J. Van Dam is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Van Dam has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Radiation, 14 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 14 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in J. Van Dam's work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (14 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (12 papers) and Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (7 papers). J. Van Dam is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (14 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (12 papers) and Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (7 papers). J. Van Dam collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Netherlands. J. Van Dam's co-authors include A. Dutreix, G. Leunens, Michael Sivak, Marc F. Catalano, Thomas W. Rice, Emmanuel van der Schueren, Lisa A. Gragg, Shawn Mallery, Thomas Rösch and Marcia Irene Canto and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cancer and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

J. Van Dam

38 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Van Dam United States 19 987 666 570 431 255 38 1.5k
Oda B. Wijers Netherlands 17 506 0.5× 558 0.8× 274 0.5× 196 0.5× 33 0.1× 33 1.1k
Thomas Ng United States 21 1.2k 1.2× 425 0.6× 122 0.2× 177 0.4× 26 0.1× 58 1.6k
Ricardo Sales dos Santos United States 22 1.5k 1.5× 491 0.7× 143 0.3× 335 0.8× 91 0.4× 59 1.9k
Jeffrey Brindle United States 11 2.3k 2.4× 1.9k 2.9× 472 0.8× 187 0.4× 46 0.2× 18 2.7k
G Tosi Italy 15 273 0.3× 513 0.8× 282 0.5× 342 0.8× 10 0.0× 32 1.6k
Lucio Trodella Italy 22 878 0.9× 535 0.8× 358 0.6× 353 0.8× 28 0.1× 68 1.5k
J.F. Greskovich United States 20 756 0.8× 480 0.7× 120 0.2× 121 0.3× 166 0.7× 70 1.2k
Shikha Goyal India 18 336 0.3× 186 0.3× 228 0.4× 219 0.5× 40 0.2× 114 802
Norihiko Kamikonya Japan 19 688 0.7× 528 0.8× 205 0.4× 312 0.7× 5 0.0× 101 1.2k
Cheng‐Shie Wuu United States 17 1.1k 1.2× 178 0.3× 1.4k 2.4× 968 2.2× 3 0.0× 52 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Van Dam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Van Dam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Van Dam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Van Dam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Van Dam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Van Dam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Van Dam. The network helps show where J. Van Dam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Van Dam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Van Dam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Van Dam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Van Dam. J. Van Dam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dam, J. Van, Hilde Bosmans, G Marchal, & André Wambersie. (2005). Characteristics of dosemeter types for skin dose measurements in practice. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 117(1-3). 185–189. 5 indexed citations
2.
Sanderink, G C H, et al.. (2004). Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography. BDJ. 197(3). 149–152. 34 indexed citations
3.
Sanderink, G C H, et al.. (2003). Radiation doses of collimatedvsnon-collimated cephalometric exposures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 32(2). 128–133. 27 indexed citations
4.
Mallery, Shawn & J. Van Dam. (2000). EUS in the evaluation of esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 52(6). S6–S11. 29 indexed citations
5.
Dam, J. Van, et al.. (1999). Molecular Detection of Micrometastases: Science on Stage. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 94(10). 3062–3064. 2 indexed citations
6.
Chak, Amitabh, Marcia Irene Canto, Thomas Rösch, et al.. (1997). Endosonographic differentiation of benign and malignant stromal cell tumors. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 45(6). 468–473. 234 indexed citations
7.
Iżewska, J., Josef Novotný, J. Van Dam, A. Dutreix, & E. van der Schueren. (1996). The influence of the IAEA standard holder on dose evaluated from TLD samples. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 41(3). 465–473. 19 indexed citations
9.
Dam, J. Van. (1994). ENDOSONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF THE PATIENT WITH ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA. Chest Surgery Clinics of North America. 4(2). 269–284. 1 indexed citations
10.
Weltens, Caroline, J. Van Dam, G. Leunens, A. Dutreix, & Emmanuel van der Schueren. (1994). Reliability of clinical port films for measuring dose inhomogeneities in radiotherapy for head and neck tumours. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 30(2). 167–170. 17 indexed citations
11.
Catalano, Marc F., Michael Sivak, Thomas W. Rice, Lisa A. Gragg, & J. Van Dam. (1994). Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 40(4). 442–446. 336 indexed citations
12.
Leunens, G., J. Van Dam, A. Dutreix, & Emmanuel van der Schueren. (1994). Importance of in vivo dosimetry as part of a quality assurance program in tangential breast treatments. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 28(1). 285–296. 15 indexed citations
13.
Dam, J. Van, et al.. (1993). A dosimetric quality audit of photon beams by the Belgian Hospital Physicist Association. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 28(1). 37–43. 8 indexed citations
14.
Leunens, G., Jan Verstraete, W. Van den Bogaert, et al.. (1992). Human errors in data transfer during the preparation and delivery of radiation treatment affecting the final result: “garbage in, garbage out”. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 23(4). 217–222. 75 indexed citations
15.
Dam, J. Van, et al.. (1992). Influence of shielding blocks on the output of photon beams as a function of energy and type of treatment unit. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 24(1). 55–59. 18 indexed citations
16.
Leunens, G., Jan Verstraete, J. Van Dam, A. Dutreix, & Emmanuel van der Schueren. (1991). In vivo dosimetry for tangential breast irradiation: role of the equipment in the accuracy of dose delivery. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 22(4). 285–289. 20 indexed citations
17.
Leunens, G., J. Van Dam, A. Dutreix, & Emmanuel van der Schueren. (1990). Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in vivo dosimetry. 1. Entrance dose measurements, a reliable procedure. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 17(2). 141–151. 131 indexed citations
18.
Leunens, G., J. Van Dam, A. Dutreix, & Emmanuel van der Schueren. (1990). Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in vivo dosimetry. 2. Determination of the target absorbed dose. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 19(1). 73–87. 103 indexed citations
19.
Dam, J. Van, G. Leunens, & A. Dutreix. (1990). Correlation between temperature and dose rate dependence of semiconductor response; influence of accumulated dose. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 19(4). 345–351. 52 indexed citations
20.
Dam, J. Van, et al.. (1980). RBE of d(50)-Be Neutrons and of 650-MeV Helium lons at Different Depths for Growth Reduction in Vicia faba. Radiation Research. 81(1). 31–31. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026