J. U. Overall
- Education top 2%
- Social Psychology
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers)Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers)Online and Blended Learning (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Educational PsychologyAmerican Educational Research JournalResearch in Higher Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. U. Overall
11 papers receiving 425 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Education 495
- Social Psychology 81
- Management Science and Operations Research 79
- Accounting 75
- Management of Technology and Innovation 58
Countries citing papers authored by J. U. Overall
This map shows the geographic impact of J. U. Overall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. U. Overall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. U. Overall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. U. Overall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. U. Overall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. U. Overall. The network helps show where J. U. Overall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. U. Overall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. U. Overall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. U. Overall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. U. Overall. J. U. Overall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Students' Evaluations of Teaching: An Update. AAHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Currents. | 7 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | The Growth of Part-Time Faculty: Economic and Quality Considerations. | 1 |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | 97 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 106 | |
| 12 | 93 | |
| 13 | The Relationship Between Students' Evaluations of Faculty and Instructional Improvement. | 8 |
| 14 | Paraprofessional Training Programs in Junior Colleges. | 0 |
About J. U. Overall
J. U. Overall is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research and Information Systems and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (495 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (58 citations) and Accounting (75 citations). J. U. Overall has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herbert W. Marsh, Roger Smith, Martín Wynn and John L. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, American Educational Research Journal and Research in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.