J. Thomas LaMont

8.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
103 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

J. Thomas LaMont is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Surgery and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Thomas LaMont has authored 103 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Infectious Diseases, 27 papers in Surgery and 26 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in J. Thomas LaMont's work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (49 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (24 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (17 papers). J. Thomas LaMont is often cited by papers focused on Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (49 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (24 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (17 papers). J. Thomas LaMont collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Austria. J. Thomas LaMont's co-authors include Daniel A. Leffler, Charalabos Pothoulakis, Bernard F. Smith, Ignazio Castagliuolo, Martin C. Carey, Rama Bansil, Ciarán P. Kelly, Sum P. Lee, C Pothoulakis and Steven H. Zeisel and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, New England Journal of Medicine and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

J. Thomas LaMont

100 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Hit Papers

Clostridium difficileInfec... 1991 2026 2002 2014 2015 1991 250 500 750

Peers

J. Thomas LaMont
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Infectious Diseases 3.0k
  • Epidemiology 1.7k
  • Molecular Biology 1.6k
  • Surgery 1.6k
  • Gastroenterology 875
J. Thomas LaMont United States
Andreas Stallmach Germany
Germain Trugnan France
Ying Taur United States
Lorenza Putignani Italy
Jonas Halfvarson Sweden
Jonathan M. Rhodes United Kingdom
Robert R. Jenq United States
Timothy H. Florin Australia
Matthew A. Ciorba United States
J. Thomas LaMont United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to J. Thomas LaMont
J. Thomas LaMont · 1×
Citations per year, relative to J. Thomas LaMont
J. Thomas LaMont · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by J. Thomas LaMont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Thomas LaMont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Thomas LaMont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Thomas LaMont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Thomas LaMont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Thomas LaMont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Thomas LaMont. The network helps show where J. Thomas LaMont may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Thomas LaMont

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Thomas LaMont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Thomas LaMont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Thomas LaMont. J. Thomas LaMont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 12
2 10
3 98
4 72
5 29
6 90
7 18
8 39
9 31
10 288
11 133
12 166
13 0
14 8
15 65
16 206
17 30
18 34
19 98
20 9

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026