J. Standfuss

972 total citations
18 papers, 447 citations indexed

About

J. Standfuss is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Standfuss has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 447 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 6 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in J. Standfuss's work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (10 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (8 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). J. Standfuss is often cited by papers focused on Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (10 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (8 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). J. Standfuss collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Japan. J. Standfuss's co-authors include Werner Kühlbrandt, Gebhard F. X. Schertler, Ankita Singhal, Dmitry B. Veprintsev, Xavier Deupí, Vsevolod V. Gurevich, Tobias Weinert, J.J.G. Tesmer, Valérie Panneels and Sergey A. Vishnivetskiy and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

J. Standfuss

16 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Standfuss Switzerland	11	389	227	54	48	46	18	447
Geneviève M. C. Gasmi-Seabrook Canada	17	867 2.2×	111 0.5×	43 0.8×	57 1.2×	34 0.7×	30	1.1k
Robert Garces United States	7	812 2.1×	107 0.5×	58 1.1×	59 1.2×	32 0.7×	8	995
James R. Valcourt United States	4	456 1.2×	161 0.7×	19 0.4×	33 0.7×	52 1.1×	6	537
Andrea Piserchio United States	18	642 1.7×	168 0.7×	18 0.3×	68 1.4×	35 0.8×	45	796
Amanda M. Duran United States	10	414 1.1×	100 0.4×	17 0.3×	24 0.5×	31 0.7×	11	526
Sandra Turconi United Kingdom	13	489 1.3×	131 0.6×	28 0.5×	25 0.5×	29 0.6×	16	638
Kristoff T. Homan United States	17	755 1.9×	363 1.6×	12 0.2×	36 0.8×	48 1.0×	26	898
Klaus Maier Germany	8	429 1.1×	102 0.4×	45 0.8×	84 1.8×	83 1.8×	13	628
Timo Eichner United States	12	588 1.5×	181 0.8×	8 0.1×	40 0.8×	17 0.4×	13	897
John J. Ferrie United States	17	469 1.2×	54 0.2×	26 0.5×	31 0.6×	13 0.3×	26	699

Countries citing papers authored by J. Standfuss

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Standfuss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Standfuss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Standfuss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Standfuss

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Standfuss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Standfuss. The network helps show where J. Standfuss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Standfuss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Standfuss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Standfuss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Standfuss. J. Standfuss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

1.

Bosman, Robert, Daniel James, Greger Hammarin, et al.. (2025). Structural basis for the prolonged photocycle of sensory rhodopsin II revealed by serial synchrotron crystallography. Nature Communications. 16(1). 3460–3460.

2.

Kondo, Yasushi, R.K. Cheng, Matilde Trabuco, et al.. (2025). Apo‐state structure of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 transmembrane domain obtained using a photoswitchable ligand. Protein Science. 34(7). e70104–e70104.

3.

Standfuss, J., et al.. (2024). The time revolution in macromolecular crystallography. Structural Dynamics. 11(2). 20901–20901. 7 indexed citations

4.

Gotthard, Guillaume, Sandra Mous, Tobias Weinert, et al.. (2024). Capturing the blue-light activated state of the Phot-LOV1 domain from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using time-resolved serial synchrotron crystallography. IUCrJ. 11(5). 792–808. 3 indexed citations

5.

Wickstrand, Cecilia, Gergely Katona, Takanori Nakane, et al.. (2020). A tool for visualizing protein motions in time-resolved crystallography. Structural Dynamics. 7(2). 24701–24701. 14 indexed citations

6.

Jaeger, K., Tobias Weinert, Wolfgang Guba, et al.. (2019). Structural Basis for Allosteric Ligand Recognition in the Human CC Chemokine Receptor 7. Cell. 178(5). 1222–1230.e10. 97 indexed citations

7.

James, Daniel, Tobias Weinert, Petr Skopintsev, et al.. (2019). Improving High Viscosity Extrusion of Microcrystals for Time-resolved Serial Femtosecond Crystallography at X-ray Lasers. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 11 indexed citations

8.

James, Daniel, Tobias Weinert, Petr Skopintsev, et al.. (2019). Improving High Viscosity Extrusion of Microcrystals for Time-resolved Serial Femtosecond Crystallography at X-ray Lasers. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 1 indexed citations

9.

Singhal, Ankita, Ying Guo, Milos Matkovic, et al.. (2016). Structural role of the T94I rhodopsin mutation in congenital stationary night blindness. EMBO Reports. 17(10). 1431–1440. 30 indexed citations

10.

Jaeger, K., Florian Dworkowski, Przemysław Nogły, et al.. (2016). Serial Millisecond Crystallography of Membrane Proteins. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 922. 137–149. 6 indexed citations

11.

Schertler, Gebhard F. X., et al.. (2014). Molecular mechanism of phosphorylation-dependent arrestin activation. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 29. 143–151. 18 indexed citations

12.

Maeda, Shoji, Dawei Sun, Ankita Singhal, et al.. (2014). Crystallization Scale Preparation of a Stable GPCR Signaling Complex between Constitutively Active Rhodopsin and G-Protein. PLoS ONE. 9(6). e98714–e98714. 19 indexed citations

13.

Singhal, Ankita, Sergey A. Vishnivetskiy, Valérie Panneels, et al.. (2013). Insights into congenital stationary night blindness based on the structure of G90D rhodopsin. EMBO Reports. 14(6). 520–526. 77 indexed citations

14.

Vishnivetskiy, Sergey A., Ankita Singhal, Valérie Panneels, et al.. (2013). Constitutively active rhodopsin mutants causing night blindness are effectively phosphorylated by GRKs but differ in arrestin-1 binding. Cellular Signalling. 25(11). 2155–2162. 25 indexed citations

15.

Sun, Dawei, Franziska M. Heydenreich, Daniel Mayer, et al.. (2013). AAscan, PCRdesign and MutantChecker: A Suite of Programs for Primer Design and Sequence Analysis for High-Throughput Scanning Mutagenesis. PLoS ONE. 8(10). e78878–e78878. 32 indexed citations

16.

Vinothkumar, Kutti R., Patricia C. Edwards, & J. Standfuss. (2012). Practical Aspects in Expression and Purification of Membrane Proteins for Structural Analysis. Methods in molecular biology. 955. 17–30. 5 indexed citations

17.

Palacios, M., J. Standfuss, Mikas Vengris, et al.. (2006). A comparison of the three isoforms of the light-harvesting complex II using transient absorption and time-resolved fluorescence measurements. Photosynthesis Research. 88(3). 269–285. 32 indexed citations

18.

Standfuss, J. & Werner Kühlbrandt. (2004). The Three Isoforms of the Light-harvesting Complex II. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279(35). 36884–36891. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact