Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman's reagent
19687.1k citationsJ Sedlák, Robert S. LindsayAnalytical Biochemistryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J Sedlák's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Sedlák with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Sedlák more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Sedlák. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Sedlák. The network helps show where J Sedlák may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Sedlák
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Sedlák.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Sedlák based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J Sedlák. J Sedlák is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Kunze, R., et al.. (1995). [Density of adhesive proteins after oral administration of proteolytic enzymes in multiple myeloma].. PubMed. 41(12). 822–6.2 indexed citations
2.
Dzurba, A, et al.. (1991). Processes linked to the formation of reactive oxygen species are not necessarily involved in the development of isoproterenol-induced hypertrophy of the heart. The effect of stobadine.. PubMed. 50(12). 1251–4.14 indexed citations
3.
Sedlák, J. (1987). Effect of denervation on glutathione and oxidized glutathione in rat adrenal cortex and medulla after repeated stress.. PubMed. 21(4). 263–8.3 indexed citations
4.
Sedlák, J. (1985). Long-term effect of hypophysectomy on various fractions of sulfhydryl groups in thyroid, adrenal and some other organs in rats.. PubMed. 19(3). 186–92.3 indexed citations
5.
Sedlák, J, et al.. (1984). [Serum levels of digoxin in relation to biochemical and clinical indicators].. PubMed. 30(10). 999–1004.1 indexed citations
6.
Sedlák, J, et al.. (1982). Changes of glutathione and protein bound SH-groups concentration in rat adrenals under acute and repeated stress.. PubMed. 16(2). 103–9.47 indexed citations
7.
Sedlák, J, et al.. (1974). Detection of endotoxin in human plasma.. PubMed. 18(4). 462–4.1 indexed citations
Langer, P, et al.. (1971). Studies on the antithyroid activity of naturally occurring L-5-vinyl-2-thiooxazolidone in man.. PubMed. 57(2). 225–9.22 indexed citations
11.
Sedlák, J, et al.. (1970). Content of naturally occurring goitrogens in boiled plants of Brassica family.. PubMed. 4(1). 51–62.6 indexed citations
12.
Sedlák, J, et al.. (1969). Effect of thermal treatment on the content of goitrogenic substances in plant foods.. PubMed. 15(3). 132–44.5 indexed citations
13.
Sedlák, J & Robert S. Lindsay. (1968). Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman's reagent. Analytical Biochemistry. 25(1). 192–205.7054 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.