Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group Classification of Vitreomacular Adhesion, Traction, and Macular Hole
2013793 citationsAlain Gaudric, J. Sebag et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Sebag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Sebag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Sebag more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Sebag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Sebag. The network helps show where J. Sebag may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Sebag
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Sebag.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Sebag based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Sebag. J. Sebag is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yee, Kenneth M.P., et al.. (2019). Posterior Vitreous Displacement in the Supine Position. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 2015–2015.2 indexed citations
10.
Garcia, Giancarlo A., et al.. (2016). Optical Sensing of Molecular Structure in Vitreous of Patients with Decreased Contrast Sensitivity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 3198–3198.2 indexed citations
11.
Ketterling, Jeffrey A., et al.. (2015). Optical Characterization of Vitreous with Multi-Wavelength Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (MWPCS). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 384–384.1 indexed citations
12.
Yee, Kenneth M.P., et al.. (2013). Long-term Safety of Vitrectomy for Patients with Floaters. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 2142–2142.1 indexed citations
13.
Chu, Edward R., Kenneth M.P. Yee, Fred N. Ross‐Cisneros, et al.. (2012). Localization of Opticin in Fetal Human Eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 4927–4927.
14.
Emoto, Yuko, et al.. (2010). Obstructive Sleep Apnea is an Independent Risk Factor for Non-Arteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 1454–1454.2 indexed citations
15.
Sebag, J., et al.. (2004). Pharmacologic Vitreolysis with Microplasmin in Porcine Vitreous Evaluated by Dynamic Light Scattering. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1945–1945.1 indexed citations
16.
Chu, Qin, et al.. (2002). Neuron-Specific Enolase in Cell Damage after Retinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 3614–3614.1 indexed citations
17.
Sebag, J., et al.. (1999). Vitreopapillary traction as a cause of elevated optic nerve head.. PubMed. 128(2). 261–2.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.