J. Schmiedeskamp
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Radiation top 10%
- Co-authors
- W. HeilWolfgang SchreiberE. OttenKlaus MarkstallerBalthasar EberleR. SurkauAnselm DeningerTrine Stavngaard
- Topics
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (14 papers)Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (10 papers)Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers)
- Cited by
- SpectroscopyAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Journals
- Magnetic Resonance in MedicineEuropean Respiratory JournalJournal of Physics D Applied Physics
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
J. Schmiedeskamp
14 papers receiving 552 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 528
- Spectroscopy 317
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 281
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 75
- Radiation 38
Countries citing papers authored by J. Schmiedeskamp
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Schmiedeskamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Schmiedeskamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Schmiedeskamp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Schmiedeskamp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Schmiedeskamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Schmiedeskamp. The network helps show where J. Schmiedeskamp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Schmiedeskamp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Schmiedeskamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Schmiedeskamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Schmiedeskamp. J. Schmiedeskamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 64 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 75 | |
| 14 | 150 |
About J. Schmiedeskamp
J. Schmiedeskamp is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 14 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (14 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (317 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (528 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (281 citations). J. Schmiedeskamp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include W. Heil, Wolfgang Schreiber, E. Otten, Klaus Markstaller, Balthasar Eberle, R. Surkau, Anselm Deninger, Trine Stavngaard, T. Großmann and N. Weiler. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, European Respiratory Journal and Journal of Physics D Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.