J. Schlenk

1.3k total citations
9 papers, 624 citations indexed

About

J. Schlenk is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Numerical Analysis and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Schlenk has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 624 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2 papers in Numerical Analysis and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in J. Schlenk's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers) and Mathematical Approximation and Integration (2 papers). J. Schlenk is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers) and Mathematical Approximation and Integration (2 papers). J. Schlenk collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. J. Schlenk's co-authors include Gudrun Heinrich, Matthias Kerner, Stephen Jones, S. Borowka, T. Zirke, Stephan C. Jahn, Nicolas Greiner, Ulrich S. Schubert, Vitaly Magerya and Anton Olsson and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Computer Physics Communications and Journal of Physics Conference Series.

In The Last Decade

J. Schlenk

7 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Schlenk Germany	6	541	86	42	41	36	9	624
T. Zirke Germany	9	659 1.2×	87 1.0×	34 0.8×	42 1.0×	32 0.9×	9	722
S. Borowka Germany	12	733 1.4×	120 1.4×	57 1.4×	51 1.2×	50 1.4×	21	835
Johann Usovitsch Germany	10	626 1.2×	150 1.7×	58 1.4×	51 1.2×	45 1.3×	21	779
Edoardo Mirabella Germany	15	674 1.2×	54 0.6×	37 0.9×	49 1.2×	53 1.5×	28	729
M. Tentyukov Germany	12	583 1.1×	81 0.9×	44 1.0×	53 1.3×	43 1.2×	23	683
Achilleas Lazopoulos Switzerland	17	998 1.8×	120 1.4×	31 0.7×	37 0.9×	31 0.9×	24	1.1k
C. Studerus Switzerland	9	721 1.3×	41 0.5×	25 0.6×	29 0.7×	26 0.7×	10	772
K. Kajda Poland	6	309 0.6×	54 0.6×	43 1.0×	19 0.5×	26 0.7×	12	358
J. Klappert Germany	8	419 0.8×	57 0.7×	48 1.1×	18 0.4×	29 0.8×	9	496
J. Fujimoto Japan	14	446 0.8×	106 1.2×	31 0.7×	49 1.2×	19 0.5×	37	507

Countries citing papers authored by J. Schlenk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Schlenk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Schlenk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Schlenk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Schlenk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Schlenk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Schlenk. The network helps show where J. Schlenk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Schlenk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Schlenk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Schlenk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Schlenk. J. Schlenk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Heinrich, Gudrun, Stephen Jones, Matthias Kerner, et al.. (2023). Numerical scattering amplitudes with pySecDec. Computer Physics Communications. 295. 108956–108956. 20 indexed citations

2.

Borowka, S., Gudrun Heinrich, Stephan C. Jahn, et al.. (2019). A GPU compatible quasi-Monte Carlo integrator interfaced to pySecDec. Computer Physics Communications. 240. 120–137. 57 indexed citations

3.

Borowka, S., Gudrun Heinrich, Stephan C. Jahn, et al.. (2018). Numerical Evaluation of Two-loop Integrals with pySecDec. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement. 11(2). 375–375.

4.

Borowka, S., Gudrun Heinrich, Stephan C. Jahn, et al.. (2017). pySecDec: A toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals. Computer Physics Communications. 222. 313–326. 186 indexed citations

5.

Borowka, S., Gudrun Heinrich, Stephan C. Jahn, et al.. (2017). Multi-loop calculations: numerical methods and applications. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 920. 12003–12003. 1 indexed citations

6.

Borowka, S., Nicolas Greiner, Gudrun Heinrich, et al.. (2016). Higgs Boson Pair Production in Gluon Fusion at Next-to-Leading Order with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence. Physical Review Letters. 117(1). 12001–12001. 147 indexed citations

7.

Borowka, S., Nicolas Greiner, Gudrun Heinrich, et al.. (2016). Full top quark mass dependence in Higgs boson pair production at NLO. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 73 indexed citations

8.

Borowka, S., Gudrun Heinrich, Stephen Jones, et al.. (2015). SecDec-3.0: Numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals beyond one loop. Computer Physics Communications. 196. 470–491. 140 indexed citations

9.

Cullen, G., H. van Deurzen, Nicolas Greiner, et al.. (2014). GoSam applications for automated NLO calculations. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 523. 12056–12056.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact