Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks
1998503 citationsDouglas P. Munoz, J. Richard Broughton et al.Experimental Brain Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by J. Richard Broughton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Richard Broughton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Richard Broughton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Richard Broughton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Richard Broughton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Richard Broughton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Richard Broughton. The network helps show where J. Richard Broughton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Richard Broughton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Richard Broughton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Richard Broughton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Richard Broughton. J. Richard Broughton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Broughton, J. Richard. (2020). Constitutional Discourse and the Rhetoric of Treason. Hastings constitutional law quarterly. 47(2). 303.1 indexed citations
Broughton, J. Richard. (2017). Conviction, Nullification, and the Limits of Impeachment as Politics. Case Western Reserve law review. 68(2). 275.1 indexed citations
Broughton, J. Richard. (2015). The Snowden Affair and the Limits of American Treason. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Fitzgerald, Ruth, et al.. (2015). A qualitative study of the meaning of oral health and self-care for 40 Dunedin residents living on lower incomes.. PubMed. 111(2). 68–75.3 indexed citations
Broughton, J. Richard, et al.. (2015). Are Stage of Change constructs relevant for subjective oral health in a vulnerable population?. PubMed. 32(2). 111–6.1 indexed citations
Broughton, J. Richard. (2006). Every Day More Wicked: Reflections on Culture, Politics, and Punishment by Death. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Broughton, J. Richard. (2006). The Second Death of Capital Punishment. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
18.
Broughton, J. Richard. (2000). "On Horror's Head Horrors Accumulate": A Reflective Comment on Capital Child Rape Legislation. Duquesne Law Review. 39(1). 1.
19.
Munoz, Douglas P., et al.. (1998). Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks. Experimental Brain Research. 121(4). 391–400.503 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.