J. Reid

714 total citations
8 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

J. Reid is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Reid has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in J. Reid's work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). J. Reid is often cited by papers focused on Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). J. Reid collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. J. Reid's co-authors include Alexander Gutin, J. S. Lanchbury, M. D. Perry, Steven Stone, Daniel M. Berney, Adib Younus, Gabrielle Fisher, Henrik Møller, Christopher S. Foster and Peter T. Scardino and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

J. Reid

6 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Reid United States 3 249 116 72 50 45 8 301
Colleen Watt United States 10 252 1.0× 57 0.5× 49 0.7× 98 2.0× 61 1.4× 17 302
Ruixiao Lu United States 10 242 1.0× 89 0.8× 78 1.1× 69 1.4× 23 0.5× 24 337
Susan K. Roethke United States 5 234 0.9× 92 0.8× 121 1.7× 127 2.5× 26 0.6× 6 339
Marie Desaulniers Canada 5 295 1.2× 112 1.0× 116 1.6× 58 1.2× 55 1.2× 6 399
Anders Dahlin United States 7 260 1.0× 66 0.6× 71 1.0× 61 1.2× 47 1.0× 14 329
J.D. Forman United States 9 274 1.1× 74 0.6× 52 0.7× 102 2.0× 34 0.8× 23 358
Rebeca Lozano Spain 6 151 0.6× 60 0.5× 61 0.8× 94 1.9× 18 0.4× 21 207
Yuchao Ni China 8 118 0.5× 42 0.4× 44 0.6× 40 0.8× 26 0.6× 26 176
Tamara Snow United States 5 119 0.5× 117 1.0× 50 0.7× 130 2.6× 25 0.6× 11 252
G. Skailes United Kingdom 9 221 0.9× 32 0.3× 60 0.8× 223 4.5× 28 0.6× 16 309

Countries citing papers authored by J. Reid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Reid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Reid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Reid. The network helps show where J. Reid may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Reid

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Reid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Reid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Reid. J. Reid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Timms, Kirsten M., Jack Cuzick, Chris Neff, et al.. (2016). The molecular landscape of genome instability in prostate cancer (PC). Annals of Oncology. 27. vi35–vi35. 2 indexed citations
2.
Mills, Gordon B., Kirsten M. Timms, J. Reid, et al.. (2016). Homologous recombination deficiency score shows superior association with outcome compared with its individual score components in platinum-treated serous ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 141. 2–3. 19 indexed citations
3.
Cuzick, Jack, Steven Stone, Gabrielle Fisher, et al.. (2014). Combined Analysis of an Rna Cell Cycle Progression (Ccp) Score for Predicting Prostate Cancer Death in Two Conservatively Managed Needle Biopsy Cohorts. Annals of Oncology. 25. iv268–iv268. 1 indexed citations
4.
Salama, Joseph K., Stephen J. Freedland, Lukas C. Gerber, et al.. (2013). Cell Cycle Progression (CCP) Score Significantly Predicts PSA Failure After EBRT. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 87(2). S125–S125. 1 indexed citations
5.
Cuzick, Jack, Daniel M. Berney, Gabrielle Fisher, et al.. (2012). Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. British Journal of Cancer. 106(6). 1095–1099. 267 indexed citations
6.
Cuzick, Jack, Gabrielle Fisher, Daniel M. Berney, et al.. (2011). Prognostic value of a 46-gene cell cycle progression (CCP) RNA signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed watchful waiting needle biopsy cohort.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 29(15_suppl). 4542–4542. 2 indexed citations
7.
Guirguis, Alfred, Esther Elishaev, Kirsten M. Timms, et al.. (2007). Characterization of concurrent ovarian and endometrial carcinoma by copy-number analysis (CNA) and gene expression profiling (GEP). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 25(18_suppl). 10546–10546.
8.
Bansal, Aruna T., Gregory C. Critchfield, T. Frank, et al.. (2000). The Predictive Value of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Testing. Genetic Testing. 4(1). 45–48. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026