J. Reed Smith

443 total citations
11 papers, 307 citations indexed

About

J. Reed Smith is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Science and Operations Research and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Reed Smith has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 307 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Accounting, 4 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 3 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in J. Reed Smith's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers). J. Reed Smith is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers). J. Reed Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and South Korea. J. Reed Smith's co-authors include Evelyn Patterson, David Newman, Samuel L. Tiras, Jaewan Park and Jeffrey R. Yost and has published in prestigious journals such as The Accounting Review, Computers & Industrial Engineering and Contemporary Accounting Research.

In The Last Decade

J. Reed Smith

9 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Reed Smith United States	6	265	78	41	40	32	11	307
Evelyn Patterson United States	10	366 1.4×	104 1.3×	59 1.4×	55 1.4×	52 1.6×	17	422
Rick C. Warne United States	6	283 1.1×	75 1.0×	51 1.2×	37 0.9×	49 1.5×	14	335
Kris Hoang United States	10	271 1.0×	73 0.9×	36 0.9×	25 0.6×	106 3.3×	28	338
Samuel L. Tiras United States	10	358 1.4×	168 2.2×	105 2.6×	24 0.6×	30 0.9×	35	401
Marsha B. Keune United States	8	351 1.3×	114 1.5×	65 1.6×	18 0.5×	72 2.3×	12	380
John E. McEnroe United States	10	325 1.2×	127 1.6×	44 1.1×	22 0.6×	110 3.4×	37	391
Jens Wüstemann Germany	9	202 0.8×	103 1.3×	34 0.8×	13 0.3×	54 1.7×	35	256
Patricia Naranjo United States	7	236 0.9×	73 0.9×	102 2.5×	21 0.5×	21 0.7×	7	284
Shuang Xue China	8	283 1.1×	125 1.6×	59 1.4×	22 0.6×	32 1.0×	18	327
Manuel Orta Pérez Spain	7	240 0.9×	112 1.4×	15 0.4×	14 0.3×	40 1.3×	21	326

Countries citing papers authored by J. Reed Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Reed Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Reed Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Reed Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Reed Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Reed Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Reed Smith. The network helps show where J. Reed Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Reed Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Reed Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Reed Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Reed Smith. J. Reed Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Patterson, Evelyn, J. Reed Smith, & Samuel L. Tiras. (2024). The effects and potential benefits of audit committee oversight in a strategic setting. Contemporary Accounting Research. 41(3). 2013–2040.

2.

Patterson, Evelyn, J. Reed Smith, & Samuel L. Tiras. (2021). How Changes in Expectations of Earnings Affect the Associations of Earnings Overstatements and Audit Effort with Audit Risk and Market Price*. Contemporary Accounting Research. 39(1). 628–655. 4 indexed citations

3.

Smith, J. Reed, et al.. (2020). Electronic data interchange and enterprise resource planning technology in supply chain contracts. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 142. 106330–106330. 7 indexed citations

4.

Patterson, Evelyn, J. Reed Smith, & Samuel L. Tiras. (2019). The Effects of Auditor Tenure on Fraud and Its Detection. The Accounting Review. 94(5). 297–318. 37 indexed citations

5.

Patterson, Evelyn & J. Reed Smith. (2015). The Strategic Effects of Auditing Standard No. 5 in a Multi-Location Setting. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 35(1). 119–138. 4 indexed citations

6.

Patterson, Evelyn & J. Reed Smith. (2007). The Effects of Sarbanes-Oxley on Auditing and Internal Control Strength. The Accounting Review. 82(2). 427–455. 69 indexed citations

7.

Newman, David, Evelyn Patterson, & J. Reed Smith. (2005). The Role of Auditing in Investor Protection. The Accounting Review. 80(1). 289–313. 129 indexed citations

8.

Smith, J. Reed. (2004). Why Britons should be grateful for the NHS. BMJ. 329(7465).

9.

Smith, J. Reed, et al.. (2000). The Interaction between Internal Control Assessment and Substantive Testing in Audits for Fraud*. Contemporary Accounting Research. 17(2). 327–356. 42 indexed citations

10.

Newman, David, Jaewan Park, & J. Reed Smith. (1998). Allocating Internal Audit Resources to Minimize Detection Risk Due to Theft. 17(1). 80–82. 12 indexed citations

11.

Smith, J. Reed. (1981). CONFLICT WITHOUT CHANGE: THE CASE OF LONDON'S HEALTH SERVICES. The Political Quarterly. 52(4). 426–440. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact