J. P. Stott
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Instrumentation top 0.5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ian SmailDavid SobralP. N. BestJ. E. GeachW. HayesR. G. BowerJ. H. CrawfordA. M. Swinbank
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (65 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (43 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (35 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
J. P. Stott
89 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.2k
- Instrumentation 1.2k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 344
- Materials Chemistry 263
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 211
Countries citing papers authored by J. P. Stott
This map shows the geographic impact of J. P. Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. P. Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. P. Stott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. P. Stott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. P. Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. P. Stott. The network helps show where J. P. Stott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. P. Stott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. P. Stott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. P. Stott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. P. Stott. J. P. Stott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | The KMOS Cluster Survey (KCS). II. The effect of environment on the structural properties of massive cluster galaxies at redshift 1.39 < z < 1.61 | 18 |
| 7 | The KMOS Cluster Survey (KCS). III. Fundamental plane of cluster galaxies at z ≃ 1.80 in JKCS 041 | 15 |
| 8 | 113 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | Galaxy Evolution in the Last 11 Gyrs and the Role of Mergers | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 229 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 90 | |
| 17 | The evolution of galaxies in massive clusters | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About J. P. Stott
J. P. Stott is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Radiation, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (65 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (43 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (1.2k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.2k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (344 citations). J. P. Stott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ian Smail, David Sobral, P. N. Best, J. E. Geach, W. Hayes, R. G. Bower, J. H. Crawford, A. M. Swinbank, R. M. Sharples and C. A. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.