J. P. Smith

714 total citations
30 papers, 555 citations indexed

About

J. P. Smith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, J. P. Smith has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 555 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Plant Science, 7 papers in Cell Biology and 5 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in J. P. Smith's work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (6 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (4 papers). J. P. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (6 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (4 papers). J. P. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. J. P. Smith's co-authors include J. G. P. Williams, Jacquelyn L. Blackmer, John A. Byers, Cesar Rodriguez‐Saona, Anthony P. Keinath, Mark W. Farnham, G. R. Stirling, Jason K. Norsworthy, Steven N. Jeffers and Guido Schnabel and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Soil and Tillage Research.

In The Last Decade

J. P. Smith

28 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

J. P. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Plant Science 287
  • Insect Science 161
  • Health 87
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 78
  • Molecular Biology 61
Matthew L. Richardson United States
Emily Davis United States
Valerie Ward Canada
Huan Gao China
Justin M. Nolan United States
S. L. Fox Canada
D. B. Walden Canada
Tim S. McCleary United States
Robert B. Mills United States
Jill S. Miller United States
Matthew L. Richardson United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to J. P. Smith
J. P. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to J. P. Smith
J. P. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by J. P. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. P. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. P. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. P. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. P. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. P. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. P. Smith. The network helps show where J. P. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. P. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. P. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. P. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. P. Smith. J. P. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 6
3 2
4 42
5 14
6
Dynamics of carbohydrate reserves in cultivated grapevines.
15
7
Parasitoids of the diamondback moth on brassicas in Zimbabwe.
7
8 6
9 13
10 16
11 5
12 18
13 103
14 23
15 2
16 98
17 8
18 12
19 19
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026