J. P. Barbour

943 total citations
9 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

J. P. Barbour is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J. P. Barbour has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 6 papers in Materials Chemistry and 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in J. P. Barbour's work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (3 papers). J. P. Barbour is often cited by papers focused on Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (3 papers). J. P. Barbour collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. P. Barbour's co-authors include W. P. Dyke, J. K. Trolan, E. E. Martin, W. W. Dolan, F. M. Charbonnier and R. W. Strayer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Proceedings of the IEEE and Vacuum.

In The Last Decade

J. P. Barbour

9 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. P. Barbour United States	8	341	331	314	146	63	9	649
E. E. Martin United States	8	389 1.1×	363 1.1×	369 1.2×	169 1.2×	68 1.1×	9	725
W. W. Dolan United States	9	398 1.2×	379 1.1×	368 1.2×	184 1.3×	80 1.3×	10	797
J. K. Trolan United States	11	571 1.7×	565 1.7×	553 1.8×	249 1.7×	91 1.4×	12	1.1k
A. R. Von Neida United States	16	372 1.1×	437 1.3×	556 1.8×	76 0.5×	79 1.3×	35	946
P A Chatterton United Kingdom	12	244 0.7×	385 1.2×	480 1.5×	64 0.4×	25 0.4×	28	625
L. C. Crouser United States	7	196 0.6×	328 1.0×	212 0.7×	182 1.2×	41 0.7×	7	508
Toshiyuki Ninomiya Japan	14	476 1.4×	337 1.0×	277 0.9×	67 0.5×	57 0.9×	35	797
R. Calder Switzerland	12	141 0.4×	139 0.4×	193 0.6×	121 0.8×	54 0.9×	25	478
R. Forman United States	11	169 0.5×	158 0.5×	279 0.9×	45 0.3×	25 0.4×	36	432
W. Uelhoff Germany	14	234 0.7×	176 0.5×	53 0.2×	36 0.2×	68 1.1×	25	458

Countries citing papers authored by J. P. Barbour

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. P. Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. P. Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. P. Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. P. Barbour

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. P. Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. P. Barbour. The network helps show where J. P. Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. P. Barbour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. P. Barbour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. P. Barbour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. P. Barbour. J. P. Barbour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dyke, W. P., et al.. (1966). An electron accelerator with a peak beam power of 1010 W. Vacuum. 16(6). 316–316. 1 indexed citations

2.

Charbonnier, F. M., et al.. (1963). Basic and applied studies of field emission at microwave frequencies. Proceedings of the IEEE. 51(7). 991–1004. 45 indexed citations

3.

Barbour, J. P., F. M. Charbonnier, W. W. Dolan, et al.. (1960). Determination of the Surface Tension and Surface Migration Constants for Tungsten. Physical Review. 117(6). 1452–1459. 145 indexed citations

4.

Dyke, W. P., et al.. (1960). Electrical Stability and Life of the Heated Field Emission Cathode. Journal of Applied Physics. 31(5). 790–805. 49 indexed citations

5.

Dyke, W. P. & J. P. Barbour. (1956). Pulsed T-F Emission Electron Projection Microscopy. Journal of Applied Physics. 27(4). 356–360. 13 indexed citations

6.

Dyke, W. P., J. P. Barbour, E. E. Martin, & J. K. Trolan. (1955). T−FEmission: Experimental Measurement of the Average Electron Current Density from Tungsten. Physical Review. 99(4). 1192–1195. 30 indexed citations

7.

Trolan, J. K., J. P. Barbour, E. E. Martin, & W. P. Dyke. (1955). Electron Emission from a Lattice Step on Clean Tungsten. Physical Review. 100(6). 1646–1649. 14 indexed citations

8.

Barbour, J. P., W. W. Dolan, J. K. Trolan, E. E. Martin, & W. P. Dyke. (1953). Space-Charge Effects in Field Emission. Physical Review. 92(1). 45–51. 196 indexed citations

9.

Dyke, W. P., J. K. Trolan, E. E. Martin, & J. P. Barbour. (1953). The Field Emission Initiated Vacuum Arc. I. Experiments on Arc Initiation. Physical Review. 91(5). 1043–1054. 156 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact