J. Nasielski
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 1%
- Oncology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- M. GielenAndrée Kirsch‐De MesmaekerMarcel GielenR. Nasielski‐HinkensE. Vander DoncktR. H. MartinM. Flammang‐BarbieuxLuc Jacquet
- Topics
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (27 papers)Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (27 papers)Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (23 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsJournal of The Electrochemical Society
- Partner nations
- BelgiumLuxembourgFrance
In The Last Decade
J. Nasielski
134 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Organic Chemistry 1.3k
- Materials Chemistry 501
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 389
- Oncology 321
- Molecular Biology 290
Countries citing papers authored by J. Nasielski
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Nasielski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Nasielski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Nasielski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Nasielski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Nasielski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Nasielski. The network helps show where J. Nasielski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Nasielski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Nasielski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Nasielski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Nasielski. J. Nasielski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About J. Nasielski
J. Nasielski is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Electrochemistry, having authored 137 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (27 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (27 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (1.3k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (389 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (246 citations). J. Nasielski has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Luxembourg and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Gielen, Andrée Kirsch‐De Mesmaeker, Marcel Gielen, R. Nasielski‐Hinkens, E. Vander Donckt, R. H. Martin, M. Flammang‐Barbieux, Luc Jacquet, Axel Masschelein and O. Buchman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Journal of The Electrochemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.