J. Nábělek is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Geology.
According to data from OpenAlex, J. Nábělek has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 4.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 79 papers in Geophysics, 14 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 12 papers in Geology. Recurrent topics in J. Nábělek's work include earthquake and tectonic studies (70 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (42 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (33 papers). J. Nábělek is often cited by papers focused on earthquake and tectonic studies (70 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (42 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (33 papers). J. Nábělek collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Russia. J. Nábělek's co-authors include Robert J. McCaffrey, G. C. P. King, Jérôme Vergne, Jochen Braunmiller, György Hetényi, Wang‐Ping Chen, Rodolphe Cattin, Soma Nath Sapkota, Jiang Mei and Heping Su and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
In The Last Decade
J. Nábělek
76 papers
receiving
4.1k citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Underplating in the Himalaya-Tibet Collision Zone Revealed by the Hi-CLIMB Experiment
2009687 citationsJ. Nábělek, György Hetényi et al.Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Nábělek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Nábělek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Nábělek more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Nábělek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Nábělek. The network helps show where J. Nábělek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Nábělek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Nábělek.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Nábělek based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Nábělek. J. Nábělek is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Karplus, M. S., A. A. Velasco, J. Nábělek, et al.. (2019). Crustal structure of the Nepalese Himalaya revealed by receiver functions and Rayleigh wave dispersion. AGUFM. 2019.1 indexed citations
5.
Godoladze, Tea, et al.. (2018). The Caucasus Seismic Network (CNET): Seismic Structure of the Caucasus. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 19744.
Karplus, M. S., A. A. Velasco, J. Nábělek, et al.. (2017). Stress Regime in the Nepalese Himalaya from Recent Earthquakes.. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017.1 indexed citations
8.
Sandvol, Eric, et al.. (2017). The Caucasus Seismic Network (CNET): Seismic Structure of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus. AGUFM. 2017.
9.
Karplus, M. S., A. A. Velasco, J. Nábělek, et al.. (2017). Structure and tectonics of the Main Himalayan Thrust and associated faults from recent earthquake and seismic imaging studies using the NAMASTE array. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017.1 indexed citations
10.
Ghosh, Aparna, M. S. Karplus, J. Nábělek, et al.. (2016). Along-strike Variations in the Himalayas Illuminated by the Aftershock Sequence of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake Using the NAMASTE Local Seismic Network. AGUFM. 2016.1 indexed citations
11.
Velasco, A. A., M. S. Karplus, Aparna Ghosh, et al.. (2016). Aftershock stress analysis of the April 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake from the NAMASTE project. AGUFM. 2016.1 indexed citations
12.
Karplus, M. S., J. Nábělek, A. A. Velasco, et al.. (2015). Aftershocks of the M7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) Earthquake: Early Results from Project NAMASTE. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2015.2 indexed citations
Nábělek, J., et al.. (2010). South-Central Tibetan Seismicity from HiCLIMB Seismic Array Data. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2010.3 indexed citations
15.
Zhou, Shiyong, et al.. (2006). A temporary broadband seismic array in Southern Tibet. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006.
16.
Zhou, Shiyong, et al.. (2006). Joint Inversion for Earthquake Locations and 2D Velocity Structure Beneath Southern Tibet. AGUFM. 2006.
17.
Sandvol, Eric, et al.. (2006). Receiver Function Images of the Crust and Upper Mantle Structure of Southern Tibet. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006.3 indexed citations
18.
Nábělek, J., Jérôme Vergne, & György Hetényi. (2005). Project Hi-CLIMB: A Synoptic View of the Himalayan Collision Zone and Southern Tibet. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2005.18 indexed citations
19.
Vergne, Jérôme & J. Nábělek. (2005). Geometry and Characteristics of the Main Himalayan Thrust in Nepal/Tibet Revealed by the Hi-CLIMB Seismological Experiment. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2005.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.