J. N. Fry
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Chung‐Pei MaRomán ScoccimarroJoshua A. FriemanHume A. FeldmanAdrian L. MelottMichael S. TurnerP. J. E. PeeblesKeith A. Olive
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (37 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (31 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaFrance
In The Last Decade
J. N. Fry
88 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.9k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 710
- Instrumentation 517
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 293
- Ecology 202
Countries citing papers authored by J. N. Fry
This map shows the geographic impact of J. N. Fry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. N. Fry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. N. Fry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. N. Fry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. N. Fry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. N. Fry. The network helps show where J. N. Fry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. N. Fry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. N. Fry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. N. Fry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. N. Fry. J. N. Fry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | The onset of nonlinearity in cosmology | 19 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 86 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | Rural-Urban Terms of Trade, 1960-1973: A Note | 1 |
| 20 | An Investigation Into the Change in the Terms of Trade Between the Rural and Urban Sectors of Zambia | 5 |
About J. N. Fry
J. N. Fry is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (37 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (31 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (517 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.9k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (710 citations). J. N. Fry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Chung‐Pei Ma, Román Scoccimarro, Joshua A. Frieman, Hume A. Feldman, Adrian L. Melott, Michael S. Turner, P. J. E. Peebles, Keith A. Olive, Hai‐Ping Cheng and Lynn R. Willis. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Physical Review B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.