J. Metselaar

484 total citations
11 papers, 130 citations indexed

About

J. Metselaar is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Metselaar has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 130 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in J. Metselaar's work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers). J. Metselaar is often cited by papers focused on Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers). J. Metselaar collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Japan. J. Metselaar's co-authors include D. de Klerk, L.J. de Jongh, Y. Kondo, S. Mizumaki, A. Yamamoto, Y. Makida, M. Kawai, R. Ruber, F. Haug and T. Kondo and has published in prestigious journals such as Solid State Communications, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

In The Last Decade

J. Metselaar

11 papers receiving 114 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Metselaar Netherlands	7	96	43	42	40	18	11	130
S. N. Shilov Russia	5	70 0.7×	15 0.3×	26 0.6×	41 1.0×	18 1.0×	20	111
A.I. Rusinov Russia	7	233 2.4×	28 0.7×	130 3.1×	120 3.0×	18 1.0×	16	285
V. Vasiliev Russia	5	48 0.5×	53 1.2×	21 0.5×	36 0.9×	23 1.3×	26	133
A. B. Lazarev Russia	6	80 0.8×	13 0.3×	26 0.6×	44 1.1×	15 0.8×	22	116
J.D. Burger Germany	6	41 0.4×	15 0.3×	48 1.1×	12 0.3×	11 0.6×	12	101
Anton V. Markelov Russia	6	100 1.0×	53 1.2×	73 1.7×	26 0.7×	34 1.9×	14	155
K. Negishi Japan	4	75 0.8×	11 0.3×	26 0.6×	54 1.4×	10 0.6×	8	101
K. Schönmann Germany	4	70 0.7×	9 0.2×	34 0.8×	15 0.4×	7 0.4×	6	82
P. Niraula United States	6	138 1.4×	33 0.8×	68 1.6×	58 1.4×	21 1.2×	7	179
Sigrid Holleis Austria	6	98 1.0×	23 0.5×	10 0.2×	59 1.5×	18 1.0×	8	116

Countries citing papers authored by J. Metselaar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Metselaar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Metselaar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Metselaar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Metselaar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Metselaar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Metselaar. The network helps show where J. Metselaar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Metselaar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Metselaar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Metselaar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Metselaar. J. Metselaar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Metselaar, J., et al.. (2025). The Cryogenic Distribution System for the High Luminosity LHC upgrade at CERN. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 1327(1). 12114–12114. 2 indexed citations

2.

Yamamoto, A., Y. Makida, R. Ruber, et al.. (2007). The ATLAS central solenoid. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 584(1). 53–74. 21 indexed citations

3.

Ruber, R., Y. Makida, M. Kawai, et al.. (2007). Ultimate Performance of the ATLAS Superconducting Solenoid. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 17(2). 1201–1204. 6 indexed citations

4.

Metselaar, J., L.J. de Jongh, & D. de Klerk. (1975). Magnetic behaviour of CoCl2.6H2O and CoBr2.6H2O. Comparison with the quadratic, , XY model. Physica B+C. 79(1). 53–75. 7 indexed citations

5.

Metselaar, J. & L.J. de Jongh. (1974). Spin-wave theory and the field-dependent critical behaviour of the antiferromagnetic perpendicular susceptibility in (C2H5NH3)2 CuCl4 and CoBr2·6H2O. Solid State Communications. 14(12). 1303–1308. 3 indexed citations

6.

Metselaar, J. & D. de Klerk. (1973). Phase transitions in an antiferromagnet with a hidden canting. Physica. 69(2). 499–534. 8 indexed citations

7.

Metselaar, J. & D. de Klerk. (1973). The magnetic diagram of state of cobalt bromide hexahydrate. Physica. 65(1). 208–212. 14 indexed citations

8.

Metselaar, J. & D. de Klerk. (1973). The magnetic diagram of state of cobalt chloride hexahydrate. Physica. 63(1). 191–196. 17 indexed citations

9.

Metselaar, J., et al.. (1972). The magnetic diagram of state of manganese formate dihydrate. Physica. 61(2). 250–258. 13 indexed citations

10.

Metselaar, J., et al.. (1970). A 100 kOe superconducting coil magnet. Cryogenics. 10(3). 220–223. 3 indexed citations

11.

Metselaar, J., et al.. (1965). Flux jumps in a hard superconductor. Physica. 31(4). 573–584. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact