J. Matthew Fields

3.1k total citations
58 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

J. Matthew Fields is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Matthew Fields has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 18 papers in Surgery and 12 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in J. Matthew Fields's work include Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (20 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (10 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (10 papers). J. Matthew Fields is often cited by papers focused on Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (20 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (10 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (10 papers). J. Matthew Fields collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. J. Matthew Fields's co-authors include Arthur Au, Bon Ku, Constance A. Nathanson, Nan Marie Astone, Robert Schoen, Young Jin Kim, Anthony J. Dean, Nova L. Panebianco, Joshua Davis and Kenton L. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Annals of Emergency Medicine.

In The Last Decade

J. Matthew Fields

55 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Matthew Fields United States 22 638 604 367 349 301 58 2.1k
Patricia Mitchell United States 25 174 0.3× 191 0.3× 102 0.3× 130 0.4× 239 0.8× 95 2.0k
Marie Crandall United States 36 157 0.2× 2.1k 3.5× 51 0.1× 231 0.7× 526 1.7× 216 5.1k
Kate Brown United Kingdom 28 212 0.3× 997 1.7× 21 0.1× 80 0.2× 903 3.0× 176 3.3k
David Plummer Australia 29 493 0.8× 338 0.6× 12 0.0× 103 0.3× 151 0.5× 112 2.8k
Thomas J. Esposito United States 39 298 0.5× 2.5k 4.1× 21 0.1× 185 0.5× 456 1.5× 161 4.6k
Ilana Shoham‐Vardi Israel 41 71 0.1× 605 1.0× 61 0.2× 22 0.1× 447 1.5× 173 4.8k
Michelle J K Osterman United States 31 22 0.0× 384 0.6× 146 0.4× 82 0.2× 638 2.1× 53 4.7k
Kimberly D. Gregory United States 39 46 0.1× 703 1.2× 30 0.1× 142 0.4× 638 2.1× 168 5.5k
Lois K. Lee United States 33 131 0.2× 439 0.7× 9 0.0× 125 0.4× 210 0.7× 168 3.4k
Susan Fetzer United States 25 243 0.4× 223 0.4× 36 0.1× 48 0.1× 143 0.5× 92 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Matthew Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Matthew Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Matthew Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Matthew Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Matthew Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Matthew Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Matthew Fields. The network helps show where J. Matthew Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Matthew Fields

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Matthew Fields. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Matthew Fields based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Matthew Fields. J. Matthew Fields is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rising, Kristin L., et al.. (2025). Engaging Diverse Stakeholders to Improve Therapy Access for Hispanic and Latino Autistic Individuals and Families. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 79(2).
2.
Treadwell‐Deering, Diane, et al.. (2024). Designing sensory adaptive environments to enhance participation in healthcare for autistic children. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 4 indexed citations
3.
Au, Arthur, et al.. (2024). Elderly female with abdominal pain and hypotension. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). e13103–e13103. 1 indexed citations
4.
5.
Liteplo, Andrew S., Kristin Carmody, J. Matthew Fields, Rachel Liu, & Resa E. Lewiss. (2018). SonoGames: Effect of an Innovative Competitive Game on the Education, Perception, and Use of Point‐of‐Care Ultrasound. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 37(11). 2491–2496. 18 indexed citations
6.
Fields, J. Matthew, Joshua Davis, Arthur Au, et al.. (2017). Transthoracic Echocardiography for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 30(7). 714–723.e4. 108 indexed citations
7.
Au, Arthur, et al.. (2016). Ultrasound measurement of inferior vena cava collapse predicts propofol-induced hypotension. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 34(6). 1125–1128. 27 indexed citations
8.
Adhikari, Srikar, et al.. (2014). Isolated Deep Venous Thrombosis: Implications for 2-Point Compression Ultrasonography of the Lower Extremity. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 66(3). 262–266. 39 indexed citations
9.
Fields, J. Matthew, et al.. (2014). Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 32(10). 1179–1182. 119 indexed citations
10.
Fields, J. Matthew, et al.. (2014). 69 Does a History of Difficult Venous Access Mean the Patient Really Needs an Ultrasound-Guided IV?. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 64(4). S25–S26. 1 indexed citations
11.
Fields, J. Matthew, et al.. (2013). Emergency physicians’ knowledge of the total charges of medical care. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 31(6). 950–952. 2 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Kenton L., et al.. (2013). Inter-Rater Reliability of Quantifying Pleural B-Lines Using Multiple Counting Methods. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 32(1). 115–120. 73 indexed citations
13.
Fields, J. Matthew, et al.. (2012). Resuscitation of the pregnant patient: What is the effect of patient positioning on inferior vena cava diameter?. Resuscitation. 84(3). 304–308. 21 indexed citations
14.
Lau, Wayne Bond, et al.. (2011). A Patient With a Large Pulmonary Saddle Embolus Eluding Both Clinical Gestalt and Validated Decision Rules. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 59(6). 521–523. 6 indexed citations
15.
Fields, J. Matthew, et al.. (2011). The Interrater Reliability of Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound by Bedside Clinician Sonographers in Emergency Department Patients. Academic Emergency Medicine. 18(1). 98–101. 101 indexed citations
16.
17.
Fields, J. Matthew & Munish Goyal. (2008). Venothromboembolism. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 26(3). 649–683. 6 indexed citations
18.
Hayden, Geoffrey E., et al.. (2007). 211: The Right Intercostal Window in Bedside Ultrasonography for IVC Measurements is an Alternative to Traditional Subxiphoid Views. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 50(3). S67–S67. 1 indexed citations
19.
Fields, J. Matthew, et al.. (1996). A comparison of ultrasound and plain radiography in the diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis. Clinical Radiology. 51(3). 170–172. 6 indexed citations
20.
Fields, J. Matthew, et al.. (1992). Case report: Ultrasound appearances of a malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis. Clinical Radiology. 46(2). 128–130. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Mitchell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marie Crandall Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kate Brown Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Plummer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas J. Esposito Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ilana Shoham‐Vardi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michelle J K Osterman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kimberly D. Gregory Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lois K. Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan Fetzer
Rankless by CCL
2026