J. Mark Davis
About
In The Last Decade
J. Mark Davis
4 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Pharmacology 253
- Cell Biology 250
- Rehabilitation 110
- Clinical Psychology 93
- Physiology 77
Countries citing papers authored by J. Mark Davis
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Mark Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Mark Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Mark Davis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Mark Davis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Mark Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Mark Davis. The network helps show where J. Mark Davis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Mark Davis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Mark Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Mark Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Mark Davis. J. Mark Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 410 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Fibrinolysis by rat mesothelial cells in vitro: the effect of mineral dusts at non-toxic doses. | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.