Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Initial performance results of the OMEGA laser system
1997787 citationsT. R. Boehly, David L. Brown et al.Optics Communicationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Soures's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Soures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Soures more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Soures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Soures. The network helps show where J. M. Soures may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Soures
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Soures.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Soures based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Soures. J. M. Soures is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hogan, William J., E. I. Moses, B.E. Warner, M. Sorem, & J. M. Soures. (2001). The National Ignition Facility. Nuclear Fusion. 41(5). 567–573.71 indexed citations
Boehly, T. R., David L. Brown, R. S. Craxton, et al.. (1997). Initial performance results of the OMEGA laser system. Optics Communications. 133(1-6). 495–506.787 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Boehly, T. R., R. S. Craxton, T. H. Hinterman, et al.. (1994). The Upgrade to the OMEGA Laser System. Fusion Technology. 26(3P2). 722–729.131 indexed citations
7.
Boehly, T. R., R. S. Craxton, J. H. Kelly, et al.. (1992). Upgrade of the OMEGA laser system. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1627. 236–236.2 indexed citations
8.
Soures, J. M.. (1991). Selected papers on high power lasers.1 indexed citations
9.
Yaakobi, B., D. Shvarts, T. R. Boehly, et al.. (1988). X-Ray Laser Studies At LLE. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 875. 9–9.2 indexed citations
10.
Richardson, M. C., P. Audebert, J. A. Delettrez, et al.. (1987). Polymer shell implosions. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.
11.
Richardson, M. C., R. Epstein, P. A. Jaanimagi, et al.. (1986). Multibeam, laser-imploded cylindrical plasmas. Physical review. A, General physics. 33(2). 1246–1253.8 indexed citations
12.
Richardson, M. C., R. S. Craxton, J. A. Delettrez, et al.. (1984). Overview of research within the U.S. inertial fusion program (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 1. 469.1 indexed citations
Yaakobi, B., S. Skupsky, R. L. McCrory, et al.. (1981). X-ray spectroscopy of laser imploded targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 300(1456). 623–630.10 indexed citations
15.
Seka, W., J. M. Soures, Stephen D. Jacobs, L. D. Lund, & R. S. Craxton. (1981). GDL: A high-power 0.35 µm laser irradiation facility. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 17(9). 1689–1693.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.