J. M. Pires

748 total citations
11 papers, 552 citations indexed

About

J. M. Pires is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, J. M. Pires has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 552 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in J. M. Pires's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (2 papers). J. M. Pires is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (2 papers). J. M. Pires collaborates with scholars based in Brazil. J. M. Pires's co-authors include Ghillean Τ. Prance, Geoff A. Black, Stanley A. Cain, William A. Rodrigues, C. Huyghe, Nei Moreira, E. Fernández-Núñez, J. L. Durand, B. Krautzer and Nuno Moreira and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Botany, Natural Resources Research and Acta Amazonica.

In The Last Decade

J. M. Pires

9 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. M. Pires Brazil	6	278	245	137	127	99	11	552
Stanley A. Cain United States	9	271 1.0×	198 0.8×	172 1.3×	87 0.7×	209 2.1×	24	554
M. E. D. Poore Malaysia	12	419 1.5×	230 0.9×	248 1.8×	147 1.2×	309 3.1×	24	818
R. Goodland United States	6	183 0.7×	158 0.6×	85 0.6×	90 0.7×	109 1.1×	7	404
Eduardo Luís Hettwer Giehl Brazil	16	316 1.1×	225 0.9×	227 1.7×	125 1.0×	101 1.0×	41	603
Edmar Almeida de Oliveira Brazil	16	361 1.3×	220 0.9×	115 0.8×	287 2.3×	65 0.7×	37	597
Oriol de Bolòs i Capdevila	8	179 0.6×	275 1.1×	125 0.9×	67 0.5×	470 4.7×	19	739
H. Walter Germany	8	383 1.4×	173 0.7×	195 1.4×	291 2.3×	170 1.7×	21	691
P. S. Ashton	5	216 0.8×	122 0.5×	106 0.8×	103 0.8×	63 0.6×	6	384
M.T. Mentis South Africa	16	395 1.4×	72 0.3×	362 2.6×	135 1.1×	125 1.3×	39	716
M. E. S. Morrison United Kingdom	7	110 0.4×	114 0.5×	158 1.2×	57 0.4×	87 0.9×	13	540

Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Pires

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Pires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Pires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Pires more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Pires

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Pires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Pires. The network helps show where J. M. Pires may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Pires

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Pires. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Pires based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Pires. J. M. Pires is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Fernández-Núñez, E., et al.. (2012). Grazing regimes and fertilisation rates: effects on dry matter yields, crude protein content and digestibility of meadows in the Northeast of Portugal.. Biblioteca Digital do IPB (Instituto Politecnico De Braganca). 311–313. 1 indexed citations

2.

Aguiar, Carlos, J. M. Pires, Manuel Ângelo Rodrigues, et al.. (2011). Effects of sowing and fertilisation in the establishment of annual legume rich permanent pastures.. Biblioteca Digital do IPB (Instituto Politecnico De Braganca). 268–270. 2 indexed citations

3.

Pires, J. M., Carlos Aguiar, Nuno Moreira, et al.. (2002). Hay meadow management and botanical composition in the Northeast of Portugal.. 834–835.

4.

Pires, J. M. & Ghillean Τ. Prance. (1985). The vegetation types of the Brazilian Amazon. e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University). 286 indexed citations

5.

Pires, J. M.. (1979). A política florestal para o desenvolvimento da Amazonia. Acta Amazonica. 9(4 suppl 1). 131–140.

6.

Pires, J. M.. (1978). The forest ecosystems of the Brazilian Amazon: description, functioning and research needs. Natural Resources Research. 19 indexed citations

7.

Pires, J. M.. (1974). Tipos de vegetacao da Amazonia. infoteca-e (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation). 63 indexed citations

8.

Pires, J. M. & William A. Rodrigues. (1971). Notas sôbre os gêneros Polygonanthus e Anisophyllea. Acta Amazonica. 1(2). 7–15. 8 indexed citations

9.

Cain, Stanley A., et al.. (1956). APPLICATION OF SOME PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES TO BRAZILIAN RAIN FOREST. American Journal of Botany. 43(10). 911–941. 98 indexed citations

10.

Pires, J. M. & Geoff A. Black. (1953). An Estimate of the Number of Species of Trees in an Amazonian Forest Community. Botanical Gazette. 114(4). 467–477. 71 indexed citations

11.

Pires, J. M.. (1953). Plantas novas da Amazônia.. Americanae (AECID Library). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact