J. Lowell
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Geophysics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- David SteelAndrew HunterAnsu BasuRobert E. J. RyderLee KennedyE. J. FletcherR.L. KennedyMaged Habib
- Topics
- Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (9 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (7 papers)Geological Modeling and Analysis (6 papers)
- Cited by
- OphthalmologyRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPolandAustralia
In The Last Decade
J. Lowell
19 papers receiving 508 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 478
- Ophthalmology 421
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 298
- Geophysics 31
- Artificial Intelligence 24
Countries citing papers authored by J. Lowell
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Lowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Lowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Lowell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Lowell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Lowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Lowell. The network helps show where J. Lowell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Lowell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Lowell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Lowell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Lowell. J. Lowell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | Using shape entropy as a feature to lesion boundary segmentation with level sets | 1 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Tram-Line filtering for retinal vessel segmentation | 16 |
| 19 | 285 | |
| 20 | 174 |
About J. Lowell
J. Lowell is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics and Ophthalmology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (9 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (7 papers) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (421 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (478 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (298 citations). J. Lowell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Steel, Andrew Hunter, Ansu Basu, Robert E. J. Ryder, Lee Kennedy, E. J. Fletcher, R.L. Kennedy, Maged Habib, Joseph L. Henderson and Sherrill Purves. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Geophysical Prospecting and The Leading Edge.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.