J. Liss

568 total citations
9 papers, 459 citations indexed

About

J. Liss is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Liss has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 459 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in J. Liss's work include Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). J. Liss is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). J. Liss collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Poland. J. Liss's co-authors include Jack M. Lomano, Larry C. Carey, E C Ellison, Keith E. Nichols, Jeffrey H. Peters, Krzysztof Łukaszuk, J.H. Check, Jerome H. Check, Diane Check and C. Dietterich and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Fertility and Sterility and Hormone and Metabolic Research.

In The Last Decade

J. Liss

9 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Liss United States	6	332	311	124	77	32	9	459
D. Galloway United Kingdom	7	413 1.2×	332 1.1×	106 0.9×	105 1.4×	18 0.6×	9	570
G. H. H. Mannaerts Netherlands	9	246 0.7×	103 0.3×	90 0.7×	140 1.8×	30 0.9×	14	399
Fatih Sümer Türkiye	9	181 0.5×	92 0.3×	21 0.2×	81 1.1×	12 0.4×	73	302
Kemal Memışoğlu Türkiye	11	313 0.9×	69 0.2×	43 0.3×	67 0.9×	5 0.2×	46	355
Shamsi El‐Hasani United Kingdom	15	584 1.8×	228 0.7×	125 1.0×	59 0.8×	9 0.3×	53	665
Pietro Fransvea Italy	10	277 0.8×	104 0.3×	95 0.8×	149 1.9×	10 0.3×	59	398
W.T. van den Broek Netherlands	12	676 2.0×	121 0.4×	476 3.8×	119 1.5×	7 0.2×	18	743
G. Steinau Germany	11	379 1.1×	167 0.5×	52 0.4×	24 0.3×	16 0.5×	53	462
Christian Buchli Sweden	11	367 1.1×	159 0.5×	172 1.4×	169 2.2×	20 0.6×	32	544
Alan de Costa Australia	11	258 0.8×	258 0.8×	121 1.0×	84 1.1×	12 0.4×	26	371

Countries citing papers authored by J. Liss

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Liss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Liss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Liss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Liss

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Liss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Liss. The network helps show where J. Liss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Liss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Liss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Liss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Liss. J. Liss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Check, Jerome H., J. Liss, & Diane Check. (2019). The beneficial effect of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in women with unexplained infertility. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 46(3). 447–449. 5 indexed citations

2.

Check, J.H., J. Liss, & Diane Check. (2013). The Beneficial Effect of Luteal Phase Support on Pregnancy Rates in Women with Unexplained Infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 99(3). S23–S23. 5 indexed citations

3.

Check, J.H. & J. Liss. (2011). The effect of diminished oocyte reserve in younger women (Age ≤37) on pregnancy rates in natural cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 96(3). S197–S197. 1 indexed citations

4.

Check, Jerome H., et al.. (2005). Leukocyte immunotherapy improves live delivery rates following embryo transfer in women with at least two previous failures: a retrospective review.. PubMed. 32(2). 85–8. 5 indexed citations

5.

Check, J.H., et al.. (2000). Prognosis following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (ivf-et) in patients with elevated day 2 or 3 serum-follicle stimulating hormone (fsh) is better in younger vs. older patients. Fertility and Sterility. 73(4). S16–S16. 3 indexed citations

6.

Łukaszuk, Krzysztof, et al.. (1998). Serum Leptin Concentration Increase During Luteal Phase in Healthy Premenopausal Women. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 30(3). 172–174. 25 indexed citations

7.

Peters, Jeffrey H., E C Ellison, J. Liss, et al.. (1991). Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery. 213(1). 3–12. 402 indexed citations

8.

Check, J.H., et al.. (1991). Ovulation-inducing drugs versus specific mucus therapy for cervical factor.. PubMed. 36(2). 108–12. 5 indexed citations

9.

Wu, Chien‐Hsing, et al.. (1986). The treatment of cervical factor with ethinyl estradiol and human menopausal gonadotropins.. PubMed. 31(2). 148–52. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact