J. Kyle Wathen
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter F. ThallLaurence H. BakerRobert S. BenjaminDennis A. PriebatRobert G. MakiShreyaskumar PatelBrian L. SamuelsDenise K. Reinke
- Topics
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (17 papers)Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers)Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. Kyle Wathen
32 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.0k
- Oncology 600
- Statistics and Probability 600
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 283
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 279
Countries citing papers authored by J. Kyle Wathen
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Kyle Wathen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Kyle Wathen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Kyle Wathen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Kyle Wathen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Kyle Wathen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Kyle Wathen. The network helps show where J. Kyle Wathen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Kyle Wathen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Kyle Wathen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Kyle Wathen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Kyle Wathen. J. Kyle Wathen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 79 | |
| 6 | 79 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 116 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 166 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration Study 002breakdown → | 531 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 139 |
About J. Kyle Wathen
J. Kyle Wathen is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research and Hematology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (17 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (600 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.0k citations) and Oncology (600 citations). J. Kyle Wathen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter F. Thall, Laurence H. Baker, Robert S. Benjamin, Dennis A. Priebat, Robert G. Maki, Shreyaskumar Patel, Brian L. Samuels, Denise K. Reinke, Scott M. Schuetze and Martee L. Hensley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.