J. J. Mott

2.0k citations
47 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

J. J. Mott

44 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

J. J. Mott
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Forestry 465
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 614
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 278
  • Soil Science 224
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 247
Replace KC Hodgkinson with:
KC Hodgkinson Australia
V. A. Deregibus Argentina
N. M. Tainton South Africa
M. H. Andrew Australia
John G. McIvor Australia
Harold F. Heady United States
Robert L. Gillen United States
Mario E. Biondini United States
Roger Pontanier France
Arthur W. Bailey Canada
J. J. Mott relative to KC Hodgkinson Australia KC Hodgkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
KC Hodgkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. J. Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. J. Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. J. Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. J. Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. J. Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. J. Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. J. Mott. The network helps show where J. J. Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. J. Mott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. J. Mott Line = papers co-authored together J. J. Mott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ecology and management of the world's savannas
1985306
2 1990148
3 1972108
4 199789
5 197477
6 197869
7 198963
8 197457
9 198352
10 199445
11
The effect of fire on the population dynamics of native grasses in tropical savannas of north-west Australia
198541
12 198839
13 199238
14
Definition and broad geographic outline of savanna lands
198133
15 197932
16 198229
17 199927
18 197426
19 198124
20 197722

About J. J. Mott

J. J. Mott is a scholar working on Forestry, Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pasture and Agricultural Systems (27 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (18 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (5 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (465 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (614 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (278 citations), Soil Science (224 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (247 citations). J. J. Mott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. C. Tothill, A.J. McComb, Greg McKeon, M. H. Andrew, AJ Ash, JG McIvor, Mark Howden, E. J. Weston, Ken Day and D. M. Orr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ecology, Australian Journal of Botany, Annals of Botany, The Journal of Agricultural Science and Geocarto International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact