Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes
19991.4k citationsH. Bovensmann, John P. Burrows et al.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciencesprofile →
The Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) Sentinel-3 mission
2012587 citationsCraig Donlon, B. Berruti et al.Remote Sensing of Environmentprofile →
Measurements of molecular absorption spectra with the SCIAMACHY pre-flight model: instrument characterization and reference data for atmospheric remote-sensing in the 230–2380 nm region
2003523 citationsJ. Orphal, Thorsten Homann et al.Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistryprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Frerick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Frerick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Frerick more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Frerick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Frerick. The network helps show where J. Frerick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Frerick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Frerick.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Frerick based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Frerick. J. Frerick is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Donlon, Craig, B. Berruti, A. Buongiorno, et al.. (2012). The Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) Sentinel-3 mission. Remote Sensing of Environment. 120. 37–57.587 indexed citations breakdown →
Orphal, J., Thorsten Homann, Susanne Voigt, et al.. (2003). Measurements of molecular absorption spectra with the SCIAMACHY pre-flight model: instrument characterization and reference data for atmospheric remote-sensing in the 230–2380 nm region. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry. 157(2-3). 167–184.523 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Bovensmann, H., Michael Buchwitz, J. Frerick, et al.. (2002). SCIAMACHY In-flight Instrument Performance. elib (German Aerospace Center).8 indexed citations
Bovensmann, H., John P. Burrows, Michael Buchwitz, et al.. (1999). SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 56(2). 127–150.1450 indexed citations breakdown →
Noël, Stefan, et al.. (1999). Global atmospheric monitoring with SCIAMACHY. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part C Solar Terrestrial & Planetary Science. 24(5). 427–434.17 indexed citations
16.
Noël, Stefan, H. Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, et al.. (1998). <title>SCIAMACHY instrument on ENVISAT-1</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3498. 94–104.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.