J. Francis Scott
- Urology top 1%
- Surgery
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Allen F. MoreyLee C. ZhaoTimothy J. TauschJay SimhanPaul H. ChungSteven J. HudakDaniel RamírezAditya Bagrodia
- Topics
- Urological Disorders and Treatments (12 papers)Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (7 papers)Sexual function and dysfunction studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
J. Francis Scott
16 papers receiving 511 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Urology 416
- Surgery 273
- Rheumatology 269
- Psychiatry and Mental health 137
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 132
Countries citing papers authored by J. Francis Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Francis Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Francis Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Francis Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Francis Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Francis Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Francis Scott. The network helps show where J. Francis Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Francis Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Francis Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Francis Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Francis Scott. J. Francis Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | '7-flap' perineal urethrostomy: an effective option for obese men with devastated urethras. | 2 |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | High submuscular versus space of Retzius placement of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoirs: results of a surgeon survey. | 18 |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with a higher risk of postoperative urinary retention. | 20 |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | 67 |
About J. Francis Scott
J. Francis Scott is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (12 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (7 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (416 citations), Rheumatology (269 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (137 citations). J. Francis Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Allen F. Morey, Lee C. Zhao, Timothy J. Tausch, Jay Simhan, Paul H. Chung, Steven J. Hudak, Daniel Ramírez, Aditya Bagrodia, Steven B. Brandes and Chris M. Gonzalez. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology and The Journal of Sexual Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.