J. Flipse

779 total citations
10 papers, 614 citations indexed

About

J. Flipse is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Flipse has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 614 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in J. Flipse's work include Magnetic properties of thin films (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers) and Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (3 papers). J. Flipse is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic properties of thin films (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers) and Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (3 papers). J. Flipse collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Japan and Germany. J. Flipse's co-authors include F. K. Dejene, B. J. van Wees, F. L. Bakker, G. Bauer, A. Slachter, B. J. van Wees, J. Ben Youssef, Markus Münzenberg, J. Shan and Shunsuke Daimon and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Nature Nanotechnology.

In The Last Decade

J. Flipse

10 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Flipse Netherlands 10 504 207 199 183 118 10 614
A. Slachter Netherlands 8 660 1.3× 282 1.4× 261 1.3× 223 1.2× 133 1.1× 9 777
F. K. Dejene Netherlands 14 698 1.4× 273 1.3× 356 1.8× 230 1.3× 181 1.5× 21 870
B. J. van Wees Netherlands 9 658 1.3× 337 1.6× 247 1.2× 173 0.9× 120 1.0× 9 732
Ulrike Ritzmann Germany 12 635 1.3× 262 1.3× 122 0.6× 292 1.6× 237 2.0× 17 689
Takafumi Akiho Japan 10 321 0.6× 160 0.8× 190 1.0× 61 0.3× 97 0.8× 34 438
Tomosato Hioki Japan 11 270 0.5× 134 0.6× 75 0.4× 72 0.4× 67 0.6× 23 350
Moosa Hatami Netherlands 6 409 0.8× 151 0.7× 122 0.6× 148 0.8× 94 0.8× 8 450
HuJun Jiao China 9 564 1.1× 289 1.4× 79 0.4× 164 0.9× 127 1.1× 20 592
M. V. Durnev Russia 15 516 1.0× 279 1.3× 398 2.0× 163 0.9× 87 0.7× 45 749
J. A. Crosse China 11 398 0.8× 86 0.4× 322 1.6× 42 0.2× 40 0.3× 23 530

Countries citing papers authored by J. Flipse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Flipse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Flipse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Flipse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Flipse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Flipse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Flipse. The network helps show where J. Flipse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Flipse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Flipse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Flipse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Flipse. J. Flipse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Shan, J., et al.. (2015). Comparison of the magneto-Peltier and magneto-Seebeck effects in magnetic tunnel junctions. Physical Review B. 92(2). 22 indexed citations
2.
Flipse, J., et al.. (2014). Observation of the Spin Peltier Effect for Magnetic Insulators. Physical Review Letters. 113(2). 27601–27601. 174 indexed citations
3.
Dejene, F. K., J. Flipse, & B. J. van Wees. (2014). Verification of the Thomson-Onsager reciprocity relation for spin caloritronics. Physical Review B. 90(18). 21 indexed citations
4.
Schreier, Michael, G. Bauer, Vitaliy I. Vasyuchka, et al.. (2014). Sign of inverse spin Hall voltages generated by ferromagnetic resonance and temperature gradients in yttrium iron garnet platinum bilayers. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics. 48(2). 25001–25001. 46 indexed citations
5.
Flipse, J., F. K. Dejene, & B. J. van Wees. (2014). Comparison between thermal and current driven spin-transfer torque in nanopillar metallic spin valves. Physical Review B. 90(10). 10 indexed citations
6.
Dejene, F. K., J. Flipse, G. Bauer, & B. J. van Wees. (2013). Spin heat accumulation and spin-dependent temperatures in nanopillar spin valves. Nature Physics. 9(10). 636–639. 57 indexed citations
7.
Flipse, J., F. L. Bakker, A. Slachter, F. K. Dejene, & B. J. van Wees. (2012). Direct observation of the spin-dependent Peltier effect. Nature Nanotechnology. 7(3). 166–168. 177 indexed citations
8.
Dejene, F. K., J. Flipse, & B. J. van Wees. (2012). Spin-dependent Seebeck coefficients of Ni80Fe20and Co in nanopillar spin valves. Physical Review B. 86(2). 62 indexed citations
9.
Bakker, F. L., et al.. (2012). Thermoelectric Detection of Ferromagnetic Resonance of a Nanoscale Ferromagnet. Physical Review Letters. 108(16). 167602–167602. 16 indexed citations
10.
Bakker, F. L., J. Flipse, & B. J. van Wees. (2012). Nanoscale temperature sensing using the Seebeck effect. Journal of Applied Physics. 111(8). 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026