J. Einenkel

788 citations
35 papers · 534 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

J. Einenkel

34 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

J. Einenkel
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 237
  • Reproductive Medicine 149
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 93
  • Oncology 129
  • Biophysics 26
Replace Kelechi Njoku with:
Kelechi Njoku United Kingdom
Emily Hinchcliff United States
Anette Kjærbye‐Thygesen Denmark
Caroline Van Holsbeke Belgium
M. A. Van Eijkeren Netherlands
Amy L. Gross United States
Laura L. Holman United States
Maliheh Arab Iran
Philippa Pearmain United Kingdom
Chris O’Brien United States
J. Einenkel relative to Kelechi Njoku United Kingdom Kelechi Njoku's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Kelechi Njoku · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Einenkel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Einenkel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Einenkel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Einenkel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Einenkel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Einenkel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Einenkel. The network helps show where J. Einenkel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Einenkel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Einenkel Line = papers co-authored together J. Einenkel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004107
2 201360
3 200453
4 201246
5 200542
6 200635
7 200524
8 201722
9 200621
10 200618
11 201615
12 201213
13 200712
14 20149
15 20146
16 20066
17 20165
18 20095
19 20044
20 20034

About J. Einenkel

J. Einenkel is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oncology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (14 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (11 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (10 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (7 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), AI in cancer detection (3 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (237 citations), Reproductive Medicine (149 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (93 citations), Oncology (129 citations) and Biophysics (26 citations). J. Einenkel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lars‐Christian Horn, U Schnurrbusch, K Bilek, Bettina Hentschel, Susanne Briest, Susanne Singer, Kirsten Papsdorf, J.‐U. Stolzenburg, Michael Höckel and B. Hentschel. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging and Psycho-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026