J. Egger

3.9k total citations
23 papers, 526 citations indexed

About

J. Egger is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Egger has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 526 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 7 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 6 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in J. Egger's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (14 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (8 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers). J. Egger is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (14 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (8 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers). J. Egger collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. J. Egger's co-authors include H. Kaspar, H.-J. Gerber, Michael Salzmann, W. Fetscher, H. J. Mahler, G. Bauer, E.A. Hermes, K. F. Johnson, U. Stuhr and A. van der Schaaf and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

J. Egger

22 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Egger Switzerland 14 422 85 78 55 41 23 526
Hernan Quevedo United States 10 185 0.4× 101 1.2× 45 0.6× 151 2.7× 39 1.0× 38 292
U. Straumann Switzerland 10 194 0.5× 48 0.6× 101 1.3× 47 0.9× 8 0.2× 25 331
A. Bewick United Kingdom 9 269 0.6× 136 1.6× 80 1.0× 20 0.4× 14 0.3× 20 332
E. Storm United States 11 192 0.5× 111 1.3× 61 0.8× 131 2.4× 7 0.2× 31 304
Sizu Fu China 10 101 0.2× 76 0.9× 22 0.3× 85 1.5× 35 0.9× 29 218
N. Nankov Bulgaria 12 210 0.5× 82 1.0× 178 2.3× 87 1.6× 26 0.6× 27 424
K. Asmussen Germany 9 309 0.7× 110 1.3× 33 0.4× 97 1.8× 28 0.7× 18 446
C. Gao United States 10 225 0.5× 36 0.4× 26 0.3× 34 0.6× 16 0.4× 19 275
A. B. Kukushkin Russia 8 115 0.3× 55 0.6× 47 0.6× 41 0.7× 4 0.1× 32 197
William C. Sauder United States 6 88 0.2× 89 1.0× 255 3.3× 35 0.6× 15 0.4× 7 350

Countries citing papers authored by J. Egger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Egger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Egger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Egger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Egger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Egger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Egger. The network helps show where J. Egger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Egger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Egger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Egger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Egger. J. Egger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Prieels, R., O. Naviliat-Cuncic, P. Knowles, et al.. (2014). Measurement of the parameterξ′′in polarized muon decay and implications on exotic couplings of the leptonic weak interaction. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(11). 7 indexed citations
2.
Stuhr, U., J. Egger, A. Höfer, et al.. (2005). Time-of-flight diffraction with multiple frame overlap Part II: The strain scanner POLDI at PSI. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 545(1-2). 330–338. 69 indexed citations
3.
Knowles, P., J. Deutsch, J. Egger, et al.. (1999). Measuring the Michel parameter ξ''. Hyperfine Interactions. 118(1-4). 73–76. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gotta, D., D. F. Anagnostopoulos, Marc Augsburger, et al.. (1999). Balmer α transitions in antiprotonic hydrogen and deuterium. Nuclear Physics A. 660(3). 283–321. 43 indexed citations
5.
Egger, J., et al.. (1998). Fixtures of tungsten and molybdenum wires applied in MWPC. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 408(2-3). 594–596.
6.
Haan, H., G. Otter, P. Wintz, et al.. (1996). Improved Limit on the Branching Ratio ofμ→eConversion on Lead. Physical Review Letters. 76(2). 200–203. 100 indexed citations
7.
French, M.T., E. Chesi, A. Rácz, et al.. (1994). A fast integrated readout system for a cathode pad photon detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 343(1). 222–230. 6 indexed citations
8.
Guyonnet, J.L., R. Arnold, J. Séguinot, et al.. (1994). Operation of a Fast-RICH Prototype with VLSI readout electronics. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 343(1). 178–191. 9 indexed citations
9.
Deshpande, A., V. Chaloupka, J. Egger, et al.. (1993). Determination of the branching ratio of the decayπ0→e+e−. Physical Review Letters. 71(1). 27–30. 4 indexed citations
10.
French, P. M. W., E. Chesi, A. Rácz, et al.. (1993). A fast integrated readout system for a cathode pad photon detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 324(3). 511–534. 15 indexed citations
11.
Bacher, R., A. Badertscher, J. Eades, et al.. (1992). Precision measurement of antiprotonic hydrogen and deuterium X-rays. The European Physical Journal A. 342(3). 359–368. 23 indexed citations
12.
Campagnari, C., V. Chaloupka, P. S. Cooper, et al.. (1992). Study of the decayK+→π+e+e−. Physical Review Letters. 68(3). 278–281. 27 indexed citations
13.
Schneider, M., R. Bacher, D. Gotta, et al.. (1991). X-rays from antiprotonic3He and4He. The European Physical Journal A. 338(2). 217–222. 16 indexed citations
14.
Campagnari, C., V. Chaloupka, P. S. Cooper, et al.. (1988). Search for the DecayK+→π+μ+e−. Physical Review Letters. 61(18). 2062–2065. 9 indexed citations
15.
Burkard, H., F. Corriveau, J. Egger, et al.. (1985). Muon decay: Measurement of the transverse positron polarization and general analysis. Physics Letters B. 160(4-5). 343–348. 30 indexed citations
16.
Burkard, H., F. Corriveau, J. Egger, et al.. (1985). Muon decay: Measurement of the positron polarization and implications for the spectrum shape parameter η, V-A and T-invariance. Physics Letters B. 150(1-3). 242–246. 20 indexed citations
17.
Corriveau, F., J. Egger, W. Fetscher, et al.. (1983). Does the positron from muon decay have transverse polarization?. Physics Letters B. 129(3-4). 260–264. 14 indexed citations
18.
Vuilleumier, J. L., F. Boehm, J. Egger, et al.. (1982). New limits on oscillation parameters for electron antineutrinos. Physics Letters B. 114(4). 298–302. 37 indexed citations
19.
Corriveau, F., J. Egger, W. Fetscher, et al.. (1981). Measurement of the positron longitudinal polarization in muon decay. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 24(7). 2004–2007. 7 indexed citations
20.
Egger, J.. (1980). The weak interactions. Nuclear Physics A. 335(1-2). 87–95. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hernan Quevedo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by U. Straumann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Bewick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Storm Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sizu Fu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. Nankov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Asmussen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Gao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. B. Kukushkin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William C. Sauder
Rankless by CCL
2026