Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutation Carriers
2001546 citationsLynn C. Hartmann, Thomas A. Sellers et al.JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Instituteprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Woods more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Woods. The network helps show where J. E. Woods may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. E. Woods
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. E. Woods.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. E. Woods based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. E. Woods. J. E. Woods is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Woods, J. E.. (2021). The safety of speculation …. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 45(5). 1069–1097.1 indexed citations
2.
Woods, J. E.. (2020). Keynes on Investment Objectives, Philosophy, Policy and Performance Monitoring. SSRN Electronic Journal.
3.
Miller, Charles E., S. J. Goetz, P. C. Griffith, et al.. (2017). The Arctic Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) 2017 Airborne Campaign. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017.1 indexed citations
4.
Nghiem, S. V., P. Clemente‐Colón, Donald K. Perovich, et al.. (2016). Arctic Sea Ice Classification and Mapping for Surface Albedo Parameterization in Sea Ice Modeling. AGUFM. 2016.1 indexed citations
Brown, G. E. & J. E. Woods. (2004). Sugarcane resources for energy production in Southern Africa.. 9–11.1 indexed citations
8.
Hartmann, Lynn C., Thomas A. Sellers, Daniel J. Schaid, et al.. (2001). Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutation Carriers. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 93(21). 1633–1637.546 indexed citations breakdown →
Woods, J. E., et al.. (1985). A method for deriving a dynamic system model from actual building performance data. ASHRAE winter conference papers. 91. 1859–1874.22 indexed citations
Woods, J. E.. (1984). Notes on Sraffa's fixed capital model. The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society Series B Applied Mathematics. 26(2). 200–232.3 indexed citations
Woods, J. E., et al.. (1978). Experience with and comparision of methods of reduction mammaplasty.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 53(8). 487–93.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.