Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Microscopic study of the high-spin behaviour in selected A ≃ 80 nuclei
Single-particle energies, wave functions, quadrupole moments and g-factors in an axially deformed woods-saxon potential with applications to the two-centre-type nuclear problems
1987585 citationsJ. Dudek, T. R. Werner et al.profile →
Nuclear shell structure at very high angular momentum
1976446 citationsJ. Dudek, B. Nerlo-Pomorska et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Dudek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Dudek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Dudek more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Dudek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Dudek. The network helps show where J. Dudek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Dudek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Dudek.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Dudek based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Dudek. J. Dudek is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mazurek, K., J. Dudek, A. Góźdź, et al.. (2009). New Nuclear Stability Islands of Octahedral and Tetrahedral Shapes. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 40(3). 731.2 indexed citations
9.
Dudek, J., et al.. (2007). NUCLEAR TETRAHEDRAL SYMMETRY AND COLLECTIVE ROTATION. Acta Physica Polonica B. 38(4). 1389.5 indexed citations
Dudek, J., N. Schunck, & N. Dubray. (2005). Search for the Nuclear Hyper-Deformation: Motivations and New Strategies. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 36(4). 975.1 indexed citations
12.
Dubray, N., J. Dudek, & A. Maj. (2005). Statistical Description of the Thermal Shape Fluctuations using Realistic Microscopic and Macroscopic Models. Acta Physica Polonica B. 36(4). 1161–1168.6 indexed citations
13.
Schunck, N., J. Dudek, & S. Frauendorf. (2005). Collective Rotation of Nuclei with Tetrahedral Symmetry. Acta Physica Polonica B. 36(4). 1071.6 indexed citations
14.
Dudek, J., K. Mazurek, & B. Nerlo-Pomorska. (2004). Potential Energy Surfaces Calculated Using Macroscopic--Microscopic Method with the LSD Model. Acta Physica Polonica B. 35. 1263.8 indexed citations
15.
Dudek, J., A. Góźdź, & N. Schunck. (2003). Atomic Nuclei with Tetrahedral and Octahedral Symmetries. Acta Physica Polonica B. 34(4). 2491.11 indexed citations
16.
Góźdź, A., et al.. (2003). Symmetries of Nuclear Hamiltonians with Redundant Variables. Acta Physica Polonica B. 34(4). 2123.3 indexed citations
17.
Dudek, J., et al.. (1999). Pseudo-SU(2) Symmetry and a Low Energy Limit of the Dirac Equation with the Woods--Saxon Potentials. Acta Physica Polonica B. 30. 771.1 indexed citations
18.
Dudek, J., et al.. (1998). Various Parametrizations of the Woods--Saxon Potential. Acta Physica Polonica B. 29(1). 407.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.