J. Deans

1.4k total citations
10 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

J. Deans is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Deans has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 3 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in J. Deans's work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (7 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (5 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers). J. Deans is often cited by papers focused on Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (7 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (5 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers). J. Deans collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. J. Deans's co-authors include D. A. S. Compston, Neil P. Robertson, David Clayton, M Fraser, Joanne Jones, S. Anand Trip, Amanda Cox, David H. Miller, G Hale and Shaun R. Seaman and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain, Neurology and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

J. Deans

10 papers receiving 967 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Deans United Kingdom	8	621	307	275	212	139	10	1.0k
Xiaonan Zhong China	20	602 1.0×	451 1.5×	266 1.0×	207 1.0×	88 0.6×	46	1.0k
Hannah Pellkofer Germany	16	606 1.0×	574 1.9×	329 1.2×	149 0.7×	187 1.3×	24	1.1k
Enedina Maria Lobato de Oliveira Brazil	19	649 1.0×	360 1.2×	388 1.4×	172 0.8×	105 0.8×	56	1.1k
Alessia Di Sapio Italy	18	508 0.8×	197 0.6×	200 0.7×	200 0.9×	220 1.6×	37	777
María C. Sádaba Spain	18	805 1.3×	486 1.6×	251 0.9×	289 1.4×	203 1.5×	29	1.1k
Francesca Coraddu United Kingdom	13	435 0.7×	82 0.3×	404 1.5×	151 0.7×	108 0.8×	15	827
Aslı Kurne Türkiye	18	284 0.5×	228 0.7×	119 0.4×	124 0.6×	58 0.4×	60	746
Pierangelo Barbero Italy	15	623 1.0×	408 1.3×	134 0.5×	289 1.4×	259 1.9×	34	951
Joachim Havla Germany	20	936 1.5×	559 1.8×	220 0.8×	265 1.3×	270 1.9×	66	1.3k
Alexander Musallam United States	15	710 1.1×	245 0.8×	179 0.7×	186 0.9×	117 0.8×	21	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Deans

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Deans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Deans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Deans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Deans

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Deans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Deans. The network helps show where J. Deans may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Deans

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Deans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Deans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Deans. J. Deans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Schroth, Mary, J. Deans, W. Bryan Burnette, et al.. (2024). Spinal Muscular Atrophy Update in Best Practices. Neurology Clinical Practice. 15(1). e200374–e200374. 5 indexed citations

2.

Schroth, Mary, J. Deans, Kapil Arya, et al.. (2024). Spinal Muscular Atrophy Update in Best Practices. Neurology Clinical Practice. 14(4). e200310–e200310. 9 indexed citations

3.

Coles, Alasdair, Amanda Cox, Emmanuelle Le Page, et al.. (2005). The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology. 253(1). 98–108. 381 indexed citations

4.

Broadley, Simon, J. Deans, Stephen Sawcer, David Clayton, & D. A. S. Compston. (2000). Autoimmune disease in first-degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 123(6). 1102–1111. 162 indexed citations

5.

Broadley, Simon, et al.. (2000). Multiple sclerosis and tonsillectomy: no evidence for an influence on the development of disease or clinical phenotype. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 6(2). 121–123. 7 indexed citations

6.

Robertson, Neil P., J. Deans, & D. A. S. Compston. (1998). Myasthenia gravis: a population based epidemiological study in Cambridgeshire, England. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 65(4). 492–496. 147 indexed citations

7.

Robertson, Neil P., M Fraser, J. Deans, et al.. (1996). Age–adjusted recurrence risks for relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 119(2). 449–455. 158 indexed citations

8.

Robertson, Neil P., David Clayton, M Fraser, J. Deans, & D. A. S. Compston. (1996). Clinical concordance in sibling pairs with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 47(2). 347–352. 60 indexed citations

9.

Robertson, Neil P., J. Deans, M Fraser, & D. A. S. Compston. (1996). Multiple sclerosis in south Cambridgeshire: incidence and prevalence based on a district register.. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 50(3). 274–279. 35 indexed citations

10.

Robertson, Neil P., J. Deans, M Fraser, & D. A. S. Compston. (1995). Multiple sclerosis in the north Cambridgeshire districts of East Anglia.. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 59(1). 71–76. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact