J. D. M. Feuth
- Nephrology top 5%
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 2
-
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 2
-
- Morphological variations and asymmetry 1
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 1
-
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches 1
-
- Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience 1
-
- Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments 1
-
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics 1
- Co-authors
- Johannes G. van der HoevenR. G. J. WestendorpPing ChangJacqueline van de WeteringFrietson GalisTom J. M. Van DoorenMarc J. SteigengaJ.A.J. Metz
- Journals
- Evolution (2 papers)Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (1 paper)European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustriaGermany
In The Last Decade
J. D. M. Feuth
6 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Nephrology 105
- Internal Medicine 35
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 38
- Developmental Biology 11
- Paleontology 29
Countries citing papers authored by J. D. M. Feuth
This map shows the geographic impact of J. D. M. Feuth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. D. M. Feuth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. D. M. Feuth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. D. M. Feuth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. D. M. Feuth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. D. M. Feuth. The network helps show where J. D. M. Feuth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside J. D. M. Feuth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 91 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 135 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 32 |
About J. D. M. Feuth
J. D. M. Feuth is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Molecular Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 6 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (1 paper), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (105 citations), Internal Medicine (35 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (38 citations). J. D. M. Feuth has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Johannes G. van der Hoeven, R. G. J. Westendorp, Ping Chang, Jacqueline van de Wetering, Frietson Galis, Tom J. M. Van Dooren, Marc J. Steigenga, J.A.J. Metz, E.J.P. Brommer and M. A. H. Giesberts. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Journal of Hospital Infection and European Journal of Vascular Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.