J. Craig Nelson
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Biological Psychiatry top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- George I. PapakostasKevin DelucchiLon S. SchneiderRobert OstroffDavangere P. DevanandMichael E. ThaseMaurizio FavaRichard C. Shelton
- Topics
- Treatment of Major Depression (28 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (11 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySouth Korea
In The Last Decade
J. Craig Nelson
47 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Pharmacology 1.3k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 425
- Biological Psychiatry 348
- Cognitive Neuroscience 253
Countries citing papers authored by J. Craig Nelson
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Craig Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Craig Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Craig Nelson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Craig Nelson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Craig Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Craig Nelson. The network helps show where J. Craig Nelson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Craig Nelson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Craig Nelson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Craig Nelson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Craig Nelson. J. Craig Nelson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 81 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 155 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 393 | |
| 8 | 176 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 238 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | Sertraline and the Cheshire Cat in Geriatric Depression [6] (multiple letters) | 3 |
| 20 | 124 |
About J. Craig Nelson
J. Craig Nelson is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (28 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (11 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (348 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations) and Pharmacology (1.3k citations). J. Craig Nelson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include George I. Papakostas, Kevin Delucchi, Lon S. Schneider, Robert Ostroff, Davangere P. Devanand, Michael E. Thase, Maurizio Fava, Richard C. Shelton, Meena Narayan and Daniel A. Spyker. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurology and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.