J. C. Shiels

607 total citations
8 papers, 531 citations indexed

About

J. C. Shiels is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. C. Shiels has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 531 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Spectroscopy and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in J. C. Shiels's work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (3 papers) and NMR spectroscopy and applications (3 papers). J. C. Shiels is often cited by papers focused on Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (3 papers) and NMR spectroscopy and applications (3 papers). J. C. Shiels collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. C. Shiels's co-authors include David Gregory, Manish Mehta, Gary P. Drobny, Michael D. Huber, Nancy Maizels, Michelle L. Duquette, Suzanne Kiihne, John A. Stringer, Dan J. Mitchell and John J. Callahan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nucleic Acids Research and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

J. C. Shiels

8 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. C. Shiels United States	7	294	255	181	160	58	8	531
Ségolène Laage France	7	254 0.9×	254 1.0×	141 0.8×	111 0.7×	70 1.2×	7	527
ShengQi Xiang China	17	252 0.9×	452 1.8×	161 0.9×	79 0.5×	53 0.9×	42	735
Jonathan M. Lamley United Kingdom	8	280 1.0×	170 0.7×	145 0.8×	129 0.8×	58 1.0×	8	418
Theofanis Manolikas Switzerland	7	364 1.2×	97 0.4×	202 1.1×	163 1.0×	73 1.3×	7	414
Heather L. Frericks Schmidt United States	6	199 0.7×	142 0.6×	140 0.8×	75 0.5×	42 0.7×	7	319
Kumar Tekwani Movellan Germany	12	231 0.8×	148 0.6×	86 0.5×	81 0.5×	47 0.8×	24	395
Henry J. Nothnagel United States	8	220 0.7×	380 1.5×	66 0.4×	51 0.3×	73 1.3×	11	554
Mary E. Hatcher United States	11	253 0.9×	203 0.8×	130 0.7×	83 0.5×	40 0.7×	12	495
Philippe S. Nadaud United States	17	617 2.1×	489 1.9×	292 1.6×	168 1.1×	172 3.0×	19	976
Anne Schuetz Germany	6	256 0.9×	198 0.8×	76 0.4×	38 0.2×	26 0.4×	7	392

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. Shiels

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. Shiels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. Shiels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. Shiels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. Shiels

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. Shiels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. Shiels. The network helps show where J. C. Shiels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. C. Shiels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. C. Shiels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. C. Shiels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. C. Shiels. J. C. Shiels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Huber, Michael D., Michelle L. Duquette, J. C. Shiels, & Nancy Maizels. (2006). A Conserved G4 DNA Binding Domain in RecQ Family Helicases. Journal of Molecular Biology. 358(4). 1071–1080. 118 indexed citations

Shiels, J. C.. (2002). Investigation of a conserved stacking interaction in target site recognition by the U1A protein. Nucleic Acids Research. 30(2). 550–558. 42 indexed citations

Shiels, J. C., et al.. (2001). RNA–DNA Hybrids Containing Damaged DNA are Substrates for RNase H. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 11(19). 2623–2626. 5 indexed citations

Nolan, Scott, et al.. (1999). Recognition of an Essential Adenine at a Protein−RNA Interface: Comparison of the Contributions of Hydrogen Bonds and a Stacking Interaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 121(38). 8951–8952. 57 indexed citations

Kiihne, Suzanne, Manish Mehta, John A. Stringer, et al.. (1998). Distance Measurements by Dipolar Recoupling Two-Dimensional Solid-State NMR. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 102(13). 2274–2282. 40 indexed citations

Gregory, David, Manish Mehta, J. C. Shiels, & Gary P. Drobny. (1997). Determination of local structure in solid nucleic acids using double quantum nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 107(1). 28–42. 97 indexed citations

Mehta, Manish, David Gregory, Suzanne Kiihne, et al.. (1996). Distance measurements in nucleic acids using windowless dipolar recoupling solid state NMR. Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. 7(3). 211–228. 38 indexed citations

Gregory, David, Dan J. Mitchell, John A. Stringer, et al.. (1995). Windowless dipolar recoupling: the detection of weak dipolar couplings between spin nuclei with large chemical shift anisotropies. Chemical Physics Letters. 246(6). 654–663. 134 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact