J Brückel

562 total citations
9 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

J Brückel is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Immunology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, J Brückel has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Rheumatology, 4 papers in Immunology and 2 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in J Brückel's work include Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (8 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (5 papers) and Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (4 papers). J Brückel is often cited by papers focused on Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (8 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (5 papers) and Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (4 papers). J Brückel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. J Brückel's co-authors include Ernst Feldtkeller, Muhammad Asim Khan, Millicent Stone, Robert D. Inman, Walter P. Maksymowych, Michael H. Weisman, Daniel Cooper, Robert W. Warren, Désirée van der Heijde and David S. Hallegua and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Opinion in Rheumatology, The Journal of Rheumatology and Arthritis & Rheumatism.

In The Last Decade

J Brückel

9 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J Brückel United States 6 363 175 134 58 30 9 393
I. Spiller Germany 7 427 1.2× 279 1.6× 117 0.9× 18 0.3× 44 1.5× 12 470
Lorna Cawkwell United Kingdom 6 447 1.2× 263 1.5× 153 1.1× 16 0.3× 63 2.1× 7 459
Mau R Germany 4 333 0.9× 170 1.0× 77 0.6× 16 0.3× 70 2.3× 6 345
Janneke J. de Winter Netherlands 5 287 0.8× 181 1.0× 101 0.8× 23 0.4× 19 0.6× 7 302
D Halter United States 5 302 0.8× 225 1.3× 160 1.2× 15 0.3× 18 0.6× 9 357
M. van Lunteren Netherlands 15 503 1.4× 290 1.7× 116 0.9× 18 0.3× 177 5.9× 34 518
Ole Majgaard Denmark 3 166 0.5× 75 0.4× 53 0.4× 21 0.4× 35 1.2× 5 176
Maria Stefania Cutro Italy 5 186 0.5× 130 0.7× 74 0.6× 9 0.2× 12 0.4× 6 215
L. Myasoutova Russia 5 226 0.6× 175 1.0× 60 0.4× 8 0.1× 27 0.9× 14 261
Helena Raffayová Slovakia 5 262 0.7× 218 1.2× 111 0.8× 5 0.1× 5 0.2× 9 309

Countries citing papers authored by J Brückel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J Brückel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Brückel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Brückel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J Brückel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Brückel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Brückel. The network helps show where J Brückel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Brückel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Brückel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Brückel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J Brückel. J Brückel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Moser, Franklin G., et al.. (2019). Cauda Equina Syndrome in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Challenges in Diagnosis, Management, and Pathogenesis. The Journal of Rheumatology. 46(12). 1582–1588. 12 indexed citations
2.
Stone, Millicent, et al.. (2005). Juvenile-onset ankylosing spondylitis is associated with worse functional outcomes than adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 53(3). 445–451. 71 indexed citations
3.
Heijde, Désirée van der, Maxime Dougados, John C. Davis, et al.. (2005). Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group/Spondylitis Association of America recommendations for conducting clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 52(2). 386–394. 78 indexed citations
4.
Li, Jin, Ge Zhang, Joshua M. Akey, et al.. (2004). Lack of linkage of IL1RN genotypes with ankylosing spondylitis susceptibility. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 50(9). 3047–3048. 14 indexed citations
5.
Zhang, Ge, Jingchun Luo, J Brückel, et al.. (2004). Genetic studies in familial ankylosing spondylitis susceptibility. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 50(7). 2246–2254. 81 indexed citations
6.
Stone, Millicent, Robert W. Warren, J Brückel, Milena Kurtinecz, & Robert D. Inman. (2003). Juvenile onset ankylosing spondylitis is associated with worse functional outcomes than adult onset AS. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 48(9). 1 indexed citations
7.
Stone, Millicent, J Brückel, Robert W. Warren, Milena Kurtinecz, & Robert D. Inman. (2003). Progressive disability and functional impairment in females and males with ankylosing spondylitis is predicted by longer disease duration. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 48(9). 2 indexed citations
8.
Feldtkeller, Ernst, J Brückel, & Muhammad Asim Khan. (2000). Scientific contributions of ankylosing spondylitis patient advocacy groups. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 12(4). 239–247. 133 indexed citations
9.
Brückel, J, et al.. (1996). [Development and outcome of motivational support during inpatient education of insulin-dependent diabetic patients--a pilot project].. PubMed. 146(24). 619–23. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026