J. Bragard

1.4k citations
69 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

J. Bragard

68 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

J. Bragard
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 346
  • Computer Networks and Communications 410
  • Computational Mechanics 184
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 53
  • Condensed Matter Physics 89
Replace Marcin Kostur with:
Marcin Kostur Poland
Blas Echebarria Spain
Mark A. Peletier Netherlands
Pik‐Yin Lai Taiwan
Tomas Oppelstrup United States
Bao-quan Ai China
Markus Bär Germany
Thomas Guérin France
Václav Klika Czechia
Marcio Gameiro United States
J. Bragard relative to Marcin Kostur Poland Marcin Kostur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Marcin Kostur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Bragard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Bragard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Bragard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Bragard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Bragard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Bragard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Bragard. The network helps show where J. Bragard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Bragard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Bragard Line = papers co-authored together J. Bragard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002180
2 199986
3 201954
4 199946
5 201841
6 201138
7 199838
8 201134
9 200332
10 200728
11 200727
12 201127
13 199426
14 201022
15 202020
16 200620
17 201018
18 202117
19 199316
20 202015

About J. Bragard

J. Bragard is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology and Computational Mechanics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (24 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (19 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (16 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (10 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (7 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers) and Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (346 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (410 citations), Computational Mechanics (184 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (53 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (89 citations). J. Bragard has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Chile and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stefano Boccaletti, D. Laroze, H. Mancini, Alain Karma, Mathis Plapp, F. T. Arecchi, J. Martínez-Mardones, Manuel G. Velárde, G. Lebon and Harald Pleiner. Their work appears in journals such as Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Chaos Solitons & Fractals, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Fuzzy Sets and Systems and Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact