J. Bordes

803 total citations
55 papers, 510 citations indexed

About

J. Bordes is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Bordes has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 510 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 8 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in J. Bordes's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (41 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (26 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (16 papers). J. Bordes is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (41 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (26 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (16 papers). J. Bordes collaborates with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Germany. J. Bordes's co-authors include J. Peñarrocha, Chan Hong-Mo, Karl Schilcher, Tsou Sheung Tsun, C. A. Domínguez, V. Giménez, V. Castillo Gimenez, L. Nellen, Fedele Lizzi and J. Bernabéu and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

J. Bordes

54 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Bordes Spain 14 461 65 45 28 27 55 510
Markus Q. Huber Austria 17 747 1.6× 27 0.4× 24 0.5× 14 0.5× 24 0.9× 45 772
Igor Kondrashuk Chile 11 332 0.7× 75 1.2× 111 2.5× 24 0.9× 23 0.9× 40 385
Chao-Hsi Chang China 24 1.6k 3.4× 33 0.5× 27 0.6× 3 0.1× 47 1.7× 83 1.6k
P. Żenczykowski Poland 13 382 0.8× 27 0.4× 17 0.4× 4 0.1× 42 1.6× 58 423
C. Nohl United States 5 241 0.5× 109 1.7× 55 1.2× 17 0.6× 87 3.2× 7 324
Shoichi Kawamoto Japan 10 271 0.6× 164 2.5× 99 2.2× 50 1.8× 37 1.4× 24 313
María Elena Tejeda-Yeomans Mexico 15 773 1.7× 21 0.3× 100 2.2× 16 0.6× 50 1.9× 44 819
Kenji Nishiwaki Japan 15 571 1.2× 66 1.0× 109 2.4× 17 0.6× 34 1.3× 33 596
David G. Robertson United States 13 496 1.1× 24 0.4× 65 1.4× 8 0.3× 49 1.8× 24 525
D. R. Grigore Romania 10 135 0.3× 164 2.5× 118 2.6× 31 1.1× 52 1.9× 49 274

Countries citing papers authored by J. Bordes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Bordes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Bordes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Bordes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Bordes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Bordes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Bordes. The network helps show where J. Bordes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Bordes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Bordes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Bordes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Bordes. J. Bordes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2023). Search for new physics in semileptonic decays of K and B as implied by the g−2 anomaly in FSM. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 38(35n36).
2.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2023). A vacuum transition in the FSM with a possible new take on the horizon problem in cosmology. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 38(25). 2 indexed citations
3.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2022). Resolving an ambiguity of Higgs couplings in the FSM, greatly improving thereby the model’s predictive range and prospects. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 37(27). 3 indexed citations
4.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2021). δCP for leptons and a new take on CP physics with the FSM. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 36(31n32). 4 indexed citations
5.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2019). Accommodating three low-scale anomalies (g − 2, Lamb shift, and Atomki) in the framed Standard Model. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 34(25). 1950140–1950140. 15 indexed citations
6.
Baker, Michael J., J. Bordes, Chan Hong-Mo, & Tsou Sheung Tsun. (2013). On the corner elements of the CKM and PMNS matrices. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 102(4). 41001–41001. 5 indexed citations
7.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2012). Bottom-quark mass from finite energy QCD sum rules. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(3). 24 indexed citations
8.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2011). QCD sum rule determination of the charm-quark mass. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 83(7). 26 indexed citations
9.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2004). B and B s decay constants from moments of finite energy sum rules in QCD. The European Physical Journal C. 38(3). 277–281. 5 indexed citations
10.
Bordes, J., Chan Hong-Mo, & Tsou Sheung Tsun. (2003). Circumstantial evidence for rotating mass matrix from fermion mass and mixing data. The European Physical Journal C. 27(2). 189–200. 7 indexed citations
11.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2000). Coherent muon-electron conversion in the dualized standard model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 61(7). 3 indexed citations
12.
Bordes, J., et al.. (2000). Phototransmutation of leptons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 63(1). 2 indexed citations
13.
Bordes, J., et al.. (1998). Features of quark and lepton mixing from differential geometry of curves on surfaces. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 58(5). 9 indexed citations
14.
Bordes, J., et al.. (1998). CKM matrix and fermion masses in the dualized standard model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 58(1). 17 indexed citations
15.
Bordes, J., et al.. (1995). Bose-Fermi equivalence and interacting string field theory. Physics Letters B. 358(3-4). 259–263. 3 indexed citations
16.
Bordes, J., Chan Hong-Mo, L. Nellen, & Tsou Sheung Tsun. (1991). Half-string oscillator approach to string field theory. Nuclear Physics B. 351(1-2). 441–473. 23 indexed citations
17.
Hong-Mo, Chan, J. Bordes, Tsou Sheung Tsun, & L. Nellen. (1989). N-string amplitude as a trace of half-string matrices. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 40(8). 2620–2625. 5 indexed citations
18.
Giménez, V., J. Peñarrocha, & J. Bordes. (1989). QCD condensates from TAU decay experimental data in the axial channel. Physics Letters B. 223(2). 245–250. 15 indexed citations
19.
Bordes, J. & Fedele Lizzi. (1988). Computation of Amplitudes in the Discretized Approach to String Field Theory. Physical Review Letters. 61(3). 278–281. 5 indexed citations
20.
Bordes, J.. (1987). E6 signatures in atomic physics. Physics Letters B. 190(1-2). 97–104. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026