Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography.
This map shows the geographic impact of J. B. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. B. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. B. Young more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. B. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. B. Young. The network helps show where J. B. Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. B. Young
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. B. Young.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. B. Young based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. B. Young. J. B. Young is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gheorghiade, M, et al.. (2000). Current medical therapy for advanced heart failure (Reprinted from Am Heart, vol 135, pg S231-S248, 1998). UCL Discovery (University College London).6 indexed citations
Ballantyne, Christie M., et al.. (1994). Relationship of increased levels of circulating intercellular adhesion molecule 1 after heart transplantation to rejection: human leukocyte antigen mismatch and survival.. PubMed. 13(4). 597–603.40 indexed citations
Landsberg, Lewis & J. B. Young. (1993). Sympathoadrenal activity and obesity: physiological rationale for the use of adrenergic thermogenic drugs.. PubMed. 17 Suppl 1. S29–34.32 indexed citations
11.
Young, J. B., et al.. (1989). General practitioners and the geriatric day hospital.. PubMed. 21(1). 24–5.2 indexed citations
Young, J. B., et al.. (1984). A time-marching method for the calculation of blade-to-blade non-equilibrium wet steam flows in turbine cascades. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.14 indexed citations
15.
Young, J. B.. (1982). Spontaneous condensation of steam in supersonic nozzles. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.170 indexed citations
Young, J. B.. (1980). Spontaneous condensation of steam in supersonic nozzles. Part 1: Nucleation and droplet growth theory. Part 2: Numerical methods and comparison with experimental results. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 81. 13306.1 indexed citations
18.
Young, J. B. & Lewis Landsberg. (1977). Catecholamines do not mediate the endocrine metabolic responses to fasting in the rat. Clinical research. 25(3).3 indexed citations
19.
Bakhtar, F. & J. B. Young. (1976). A comparison between theoretical calculations and experimental measurements of droplet sizes in nucleating steam flows. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.14 indexed citations
20.
Young, J. B. & Lewis Landsberg. (1976). Decreased sympathetic activity during fasting. Clinical research. 24(5).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.