J. A. Harlow
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- John L. BarburMarisa Rodríguez‐CarmonaGordon T. PlantHelen C. WalkeyLindsay T. SharpeWolfgang SchalchLawrence WeiskrantzWolfgang Köpcke
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers)Color Science and Applications (8 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVision Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
J. A. Harlow
23 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cognitive Neuroscience 279
- Ophthalmology 160
- Social Psychology 104
- Epidemiology 95
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 94
Countries citing papers authored by J. A. Harlow
This map shows the geographic impact of J. A. Harlow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. A. Harlow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. A. Harlow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. A. Harlow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. A. Harlow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. A. Harlow. The network helps show where J. A. Harlow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. A. Harlow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. A. Harlow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. A. Harlow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. A. Harlow. J. A. Harlow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 63 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurements using visual displays – a new method and first results | 3 |
| 12 | Chromatic Sensitivity Changes in Relation to Macular Pigment Optical Density (MPOD) in Human Vision | 3 |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 99 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About J. A. Harlow
J. A. Harlow is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 23 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Color Science and Applications (8 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (160 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (279 citations) and Biochemistry (47 citations). J. A. Harlow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John L. Barbur, Marisa Rodríguez‐Carmona, Gordon T. Plant, Helen C. Walkey, Lindsay T. Sharpe, Wolfgang Schalch, Lawrence Weiskrantz, Wolfgang Köpcke, Evgenia Konstantakopoulou and Jay Neitz. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.