Ivy F.L. Tsui
About
In The Last Decade
Ivy F.L. Tsui
9 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Molecular Biology 135
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 103
- Oncology 102
- Immunology 78
- Cancer Research 62
Countries citing papers authored by Ivy F.L. Tsui
This map shows the geographic impact of Ivy F.L. Tsui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivy F.L. Tsui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivy F.L. Tsui more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ivy F.L. Tsui
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivy F.L. Tsui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivy F.L. Tsui. The network helps show where Ivy F.L. Tsui may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ivy F.L. Tsui
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ivy F.L. Tsui. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ivy F.L. Tsui based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ivy F.L. Tsui. Ivy F.L. Tsui is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 145 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | Public databases and software for the pathway analysis of cancer genomes. | 10 |
| 9 | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.