Ivor Shapiro

539 total citations
13 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Ivor Shapiro is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Ivor Shapiro has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Communication, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Ivor Shapiro's work include Media Studies and Communication (8 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers). Ivor Shapiro is often cited by papers focused on Media Studies and Communication (8 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers). Ivor Shapiro collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and Czechia. Ivor Shapiro's co-authors include Patrizia Albanese, Marshall Lee, Olivier Standaert, Vinzenz Wyss and Philippa Spoel and has published in prestigious journals such as Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Digital Journalism and Journalism Studies.

In The Last Decade

Ivor Shapiro

12 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ivor Shapiro Canada	8	215	148	36	32	23	13	288
Oren Soffer Israel	9	151 0.7×	139 0.9×	39 1.1×	28 0.9×	25 1.1×	33	298
Brian Creech United States	10	229 1.1×	134 0.9×	40 1.1×	30 0.9×	20 0.9×	35	330
Henrik Bødker Denmark	10	248 1.2×	168 1.1×	33 0.9×	28 0.9×	19 0.8×	32	348
Charlie Beckett United Kingdom	7	235 1.1×	167 1.1×	50 1.4×	28 0.9×	33 1.4×	22	372
Philemon Bantimaroudis Greece	9	205 1.0×	173 1.2×	22 0.6×	21 0.7×	14 0.6×	38	310
Florence Le Cam Belgium	11	307 1.4×	208 1.4×	34 0.9×	21 0.7×	15 0.7×	71	456
Jesús Pérez Dasilva Spain	8	235 1.1×	155 1.0×	14 0.4×	18 0.6×	28 1.2×	66	339
Renira Rampazzo Gambarato Russia	9	97 0.5×	122 0.8×	43 1.2×	13 0.4×	10 0.4×	38	259
Yael de Haan Netherlands	10	213 1.0×	167 1.1×	86 2.4×	8 0.3×	24 1.0×	22	364
Hugo de Burgh United Kingdom	9	213 1.0×	168 1.1×	33 0.9×	25 0.8×	13 0.6×	23	339

Countries citing papers authored by Ivor Shapiro

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivor Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivor Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivor Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivor Shapiro

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivor Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivor Shapiro. The network helps show where Ivor Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ivor Shapiro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ivor Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ivor Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ivor Shapiro. Ivor Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2019). Just Who Do Canadian Journalists Think They Are? Political Role Conceptions in Global and Historical Perspective. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 52(3). 461–477. 6 indexed citations

2.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2017). Quelle Différence?. Journalism Studies. 18(5). 536–554. 21 indexed citations

3.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2016). Images of Essence: Journalists’ Discourse on the Professional “Discipline of Verification”. Canadian Journal of Communication. 41(1). 37–48. 6 indexed citations

4.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2016). How the “Right to be Forgotten” Challenges Journalistic Principles. Digital Journalism. 5(9). 1101–1115. 9 indexed citations

5.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2016). Images of Essence: Journalists’ Discourse on the Professional “Discipline of Verification”. Canadian Journal of Communication. 41(1). 37–48. 3 indexed citations

6.

Shapiro, Ivor. (2014). Book Review: The New Ethics of Journalism: Principles for the 21st Century, edited by Kelly McBride and Tom Rosenstiel. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 91(2). 406–408.

7.

Shapiro, Ivor. (2014). The Future of Journalism: developments and debates. Digital Journalism. 2(4). 619–621. 9 indexed citations

8.

Shapiro, Ivor. (2014). Why democracies need a Functional Definition of Journalism now more than ever. Journalism Studies. 15(5). 555–565. 35 indexed citations

9.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2013). Reasons for Veiled Sources Spike after 2004 Scandals. Newspaper Research Journal. 34(2). 36–49. 4 indexed citations

10.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2013). Verification as a Strategic Ritual. Journalism Practice. 7(6). 657–673. 94 indexed citations

11.

Shapiro, Ivor. (2009). EVALUATING JOURNALISM. Journalism Practice. 4(2). 143–162. 40 indexed citations

12.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2007). Online Editors Rate Web News Quality Criteria. Newspaper Research Journal. 28(1). 55–69. 43 indexed citations

13.

Shapiro, Ivor, et al.. (2006). What Makes Journalism “Excellent”? Criteria Identified by Judges in Two Leading Awards Programs. Canadian Journal of Communication. 31(2). 425–445. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact