Brian Creech

539 citations
35 papers · 341 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Media Studies and Communication 18
    • Social Media and Politics 6
    • Public Relations and Crisis Communication 3
    • Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media 3
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 11

Brian Creech

34 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Brian Creech
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Communication 233
  • Literature and Literary Theory 40
  • Sociology and Political Science 136
  • Gender Studies 27
  • Philosophy 31
Replace Laura Ahva with:
Laura Ahva Finland
Florence Le Cam Belgium
Vincent Raynauld Canada
Adrienne Russell United States
Terje Rasmussen Norway
Ida Schultz United States
Alejandro Barranquero Carretero Spain
Philemon Bantimaroudis Greece
Henrik Bødker Denmark
Hugo de Burgh United Kingdom
Brian Creech relative to Laura Ahva Finland Laura Ahva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Laura Ahva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Creech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Creech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Creech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Creech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Creech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Creech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Creech. The network helps show where Brian Creech may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Brian Creech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Creech Line = papers co-authored together Brian Creech links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201772
2 201546
3 202026
4 201724
5 201719
6 202018
7 201813
8 202211
9 201410
10 202010
11 202110
12 20169
13 20169
14 20187
15 20137
16 20216
17 20225
18
A Forum on Digital Storytelling| Interview with Henry Jenkins
20174
19 20144
20 20164

About Brian Creech

Brian Creech is a scholar working on Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 35 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (18 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (11 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (7 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (5 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers) and Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (233 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (40 citations), Sociology and Political Science (136 citations), Gender Studies (27 citations) and Philosophy (31 citations). Brian Creech has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Nadler, Andrew L. Mendelson, Jessica Maddox, Perry Parks, Henry Jenkins, Janet Murray, Weimei Sun, Marie‐Laure Ryan, Zizi Papacharissi and Stephen McCreery. Their work appears in journals such as Journalism, Journalism Studies, The Communication Review, Media Culture & Society and Digital Journalism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact