I.T. Diamond
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 7
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function 30
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 24
- Developmental Biology top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 16
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 14
- Neurology top 1%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 8
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 10
-
- Bat Biology and Ecology Studies 8
- Co-authors
- Wendy HallJohn K. HartingDenis RaczkowskiMichael ConleyDavid FitzpatrickW. D. NeffT.P.S. PowellE.G. Jones
- Journals
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (26 papers)Brain Research (14 papers)Journal of Neurophysiology (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
I.T. Diamond
92 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Sensory Systems 957
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.7k
- Developmental Biology 264
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.2k
- Neurology 637
Countries citing papers authored by I.T. Diamond
This map shows the geographic impact of I.T. Diamond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.T. Diamond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.T. Diamond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I.T. Diamond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.T. Diamond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.T. Diamond. The network helps show where I.T. Diamond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside I.T. Diamond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 59 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 30 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 68 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 108 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 34 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 55 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 22 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1976 | 80 | |
| 11 | 1976 | 46 | |
| 12 | 1975 | 87 | |
| 13 | 1974 | 121 | |
| 14 | 1973 | 101 | |
| 15 | 1972 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 88 | |
| 17 | 1968 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1966 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1963 | 56 | |
| 20 | 1957 | 125 |
About I.T. Diamond
I.T. Diamond is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Neurology and Developmental Biology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (30 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (8 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (8 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (957 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.7k citations), Developmental Biology (264 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.2k citations) and Neurology (637 citations). I.T. Diamond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Hall, John K. Harting, Denis Raczkowski, Michael Conley, David Fitzpatrick, W. D. Neff, T.P.S. Powell, E.G. Jones, Russell G. Carey and George F. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Brain Research, Journal of Neurophysiology, Science and European Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.