Johan Hulleman

1.6k total citations
52 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Johan Hulleman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Johan Hulleman has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Johan Hulleman's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (20 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (9 papers). Johan Hulleman is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (20 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (9 papers). Johan Hulleman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Johan Hulleman's co-authors include Christian N. L. Olivers, Glyn W. Humphreys, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Casper J. Erkelens, Jason J. Braithwaite, Frans Boselie, Scott A. Cairney, Penelope A. Lewis, Simon Durrant and Marco Bertamini and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Experimental Brain Research and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Johan Hulleman

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Johan Hulleman United Kingdom 20 969 248 165 160 75 52 1.2k
Yoni Pertzov Israel 19 1.2k 1.3× 243 1.0× 156 0.9× 200 1.3× 103 1.4× 65 1.5k
Hinze Hogendoorn Netherlands 19 1.2k 1.3× 289 1.2× 86 0.5× 219 1.4× 123 1.6× 62 1.4k
Manfred MacKeben United States 16 1.5k 1.6× 259 1.0× 152 0.9× 145 0.9× 117 1.6× 45 1.9k
Adriane E. Seiffert United States 14 1.6k 1.6× 290 1.2× 120 0.7× 185 1.2× 102 1.4× 34 1.8k
Alan Chauvin France 19 769 0.8× 196 0.8× 172 1.0× 85 0.5× 26 0.3× 51 978
Stephanie A. McMains United States 12 1.3k 1.4× 214 0.9× 136 0.8× 97 0.6× 23 0.3× 18 1.4k
Tal Makovski United States 22 1.4k 1.4× 346 1.4× 102 0.6× 250 1.6× 54 0.7× 46 1.5k
Jason M. Scimeca United States 15 889 0.9× 194 0.8× 66 0.4× 237 1.5× 29 0.4× 19 1.1k
Isabella Dascola Italy 4 1.4k 1.5× 227 0.9× 127 0.8× 229 1.4× 85 1.1× 8 1.5k
Edward F. Ester United States 18 2.0k 2.1× 218 0.9× 89 0.5× 155 1.0× 37 0.5× 31 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Hulleman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Hulleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Hulleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Hulleman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Hulleman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Hulleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Hulleman. The network helps show where Johan Hulleman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan Hulleman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan Hulleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan Hulleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johan Hulleman. Johan Hulleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Li, Aoqi, Jeremy M. Wolfe, & Johan Hulleman. (2025). Errors in visual search: How can we reduce them?. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 87(5). 1471–1495.
2.
Li, Aoqi, Johan Hulleman, & Jeremy M. Wolfe. (2024). Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 9(1). 15–15. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hulleman, Johan, et al.. (2019). Medium versus difficult visual search: How a quantitative change in the functional visual field leads to a qualitative difference in performance. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(1). 118–139. 6 indexed citations
4.
Pobric, Gorana, Johan Hulleman, Michal Lavidor, et al.. (2018). Seeing the World as it is: Mimicking Veridical Motion Perception in Schizophrenia Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Healthy Participants. Brain Topography. 31(5). 827–837. 4 indexed citations
5.
Hulleman, Johan, et al.. (2012). Eye movements reveal how task difficulty moulds visual search.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 39(1). 168–190. 49 indexed citations
6.
Hulleman, Johan. (2010). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: Only in difficult search are items tagged individually. Vision Research. 50(20). 2069–2079. 12 indexed citations
7.
Olivers, Christian N. L., Johan Hulleman, Thomas M. Spalek, Jun‐ichiro Kawahara, & Vincent Di Lollo. (2010). The sparing is far from spurious: Reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 37(2). 396–408. 11 indexed citations
8.
Hulleman, Johan. (2009). No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 16(1). 116–120. 18 indexed citations
9.
Braithwaite, Jason J., et al.. (2009). Measuring the spread of spreading suppression: A time-course analysis of spreading suppression and its impact on attentional selection. Vision Research. 50(3). 346–356. 4 indexed citations
11.
Hulleman, Johan & Christian N. L. Olivers. (2007). Concavities count for less in symmetry perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14(6). 1212–1217. 8 indexed citations
12.
Braithwaite, Jason J., Glyn W. Humphreys, Johan Hulleman, & Derrick G. Watson. (2007). Fast color grouping and slow color inhibition: Evidence for distinct temporal windows for separate processes in preview search.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 33(3). 503–517. 19 indexed citations
13.
Bertamini, Marco & Johan Hulleman. (2006). Amodal completion and visual holes (static and moving). Acta Psychologica. 123(1-2). 55–72. 21 indexed citations
14.
Braithwaite, Jason J., Johan Hulleman, Derrick G. Watson, & Glyn W. Humphreys. (2006). Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search. Perception & Psychophysics. 68(2). 290–300. 28 indexed citations
15.
Hulleman, Johan. (2005). The mathematics of multiple object tracking: From proportions correct to number of objects tracked. Vision Research. 45(17). 2298–2309. 57 indexed citations
16.
Hulleman, Johan & Glyn W. Humphreys. (2005). Differences between searching among objects and searching among holes. Perception & Psychophysics. 67(3). 469–482. 14 indexed citations
17.
Hulleman, Johan, et al.. (2005). The time course of figure-ground reversal. Perception & Psychophysics. 67(4). 595–605. 4 indexed citations
18.
Cooper, Adam, Glyn W. Humphreys, Johan Hulleman, Peter Praamstra, & Mark A. Georgeson. (2004). Transcranial magnetic stimulation to right parietal cortex modifies the attentional blink. Experimental Brain Research. 155(1). 24–29. 34 indexed citations
19.
Hulleman, Johan & Glyn W. Humphreys. (2004). A new cue to figure–ground coding: top–bottom polarity. Vision Research. 44(24). 2779–2791. 26 indexed citations
20.
Hulleman, Johan, et al.. (2000). Concavities as basic features in visual search: Evidence from search asymmetries. Perception & Psychophysics. 62(1). 162–174. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026