International Monetary Fund
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.05%
- Finance top 0.1%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 0.1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.2%
- Topics
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies (691 papers)Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (549 papers)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (546 papers)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économiqueOccasional paperWorld Bank eBooks
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumNepal
In The Last Decade
International Monetary Fund
3.1k papers receiving 10.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
- Economics and Econometrics 5.5k
- Finance 4.7k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.8k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.7k
- Political Science and International Relations 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by International Monetary Fund
This map shows the geographic impact of International Monetary Fund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by International Monetary Fund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Monetary Fund more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by International Monetary Fund
This network shows the impact of papers produced by International Monetary Fund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by International Monetary Fund. The network helps show where International Monetary Fund may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of International Monetary Fund
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of International Monetary Fund. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of International Monetary Fund based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with International Monetary Fund. International Monetary Fund is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | 111 |
About International Monetary Fund
International Monetary Fund is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Development, having authored 4.0k papers that have together received 12.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Financial Crisis and Policies (691 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (549 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (546 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (4.7k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (3.8k citations) and Development (921 citations). International Monetary Fund has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include World Bank, United Nations and International Labour Office. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique, Occasional paper and World Bank eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.